Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tex-Con-Man
Serrano clearly states he's been questioning the justices about his eligibility for 10 years...Sheesh...I even highlighted it in red.

Yet you didn't actually present anything older than a few years ago. There's no way to know if it was a literal comment or an exaggeration, although it doesn't matter.

Kinda predates Obama doncha think?

It doesn't matter. Serrano wasn't the one who said it was being evaded. That's why I asked for comments to see how it was being responded to. Remember?? I said, "let's see where it was used before and see if it was treated the same way."

You've made an assumption about Clarence Thomas's comment that doesn't make sense outside of the context of Obama's eligibility being challenged (along with McCain's ... which Serrano specifically referenced). At best you've shown Justice Kennedy saying something about Serrano's presidential ambitions subsiding, but this doesn't negate Clarence Thomas comments from being influenced by the eligibility lawsuits.

This is an example of why I seldom try to reason with birthers anymore. They refuse to acknowledge reality.

Labeling people as "birthers" is not how one acknowledges reality. You would save yourself a lot of embarrassment by simply not posing on this issue, since you can't back up your claims. t negate Clarence Thomas comments from being influenced by the eligibility lawsuits.

235 posted on 12/30/2011 11:21:46 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]


To: edge919
I knew you weren't going to be convinced...because you don't want to be.

You are one of the noobs that post on nothing but birther threads. You seem obsessed with the conspiracy...and heavily invested in keeping it going...for whatever reason.

Only someone wearing birther conspiracy goggles can't see that Serrano saying he's been trying unsuccessfully to get an answer for ten years means the justices have been evading it for ten years.

Who knows...Maybe I'll start pinging you to some other threads to get your opinions on the Iowa caucus, or Ron Paul, or Fast and Furious, or gay marriage, or Newt's 3rd wife, or Ed Rollins, or the Santorum surge, or Holder's assault on the new voter ID laws...y’know...the stuff that will actually matter come November?

244 posted on 12/31/2011 8:21:32 AM PST by Tex-Con-Man (T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]

To: edge919
A freeper suggesting Ron Paul run 3rd party...

Run Ron Run! Why a 3rd Party Run by Ron Paul could help the GOP. (Vanity)

Wadya think, edge? Good idea? Bad idea? A Ron Paul fan? Ya' think he's nuts? 3rd party help the GOP?

245 posted on 12/31/2011 10:32:49 AM PST by Tex-Con-Man (T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson