It is well within your rights to butt into my conversations with other posters, but I find it very strange that you do.
And why do you see the sharpness of the debate only coming in one direction? Clearly I was responding snark for snark. I should not do it perhaps, but while I often respond - I very rarely initiate. (and that I should never do)
And this is not PR - this is a debate forum.
But again, your interest in my conversations with others is really unusual.
If I claimed to be a featured writer for American Thinker and a “ghost contributor” [Really? Really??] to Rush Limbaugh, then yes, I’d consider my posts on FR to be PR. If I ran around insulting good, patriotic conservatives, how would that reflect well on the people w whom I claim an affiliation?
Answer: it would reflect very negatively.
As to why I comment on your posts, it’s simple. They are remarkably immature and in some cases obnoxious. Which again, if you really do write for both AT and Limbaugh, is a very bizarre way of representing those connections. If I were Rush, or had a stake in AT, I would NOT want you representing me.
“Big Rubio supporter for future higher office and not a fan of the birther movement”
This admission just about sums up your true interest in this topic.
You want to be able to do what Obama had done, namely, usurp the Constitution.