Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Perry files emergency motion to get name on Va. primary ballot
Richmond Times-Dispatch ^ | December 28, 2011 | Andrew Cain

Posted on 12/28/2011 1:10:59 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

Texas Gov. Rick Perry today filed an emergency motion in U.S. District Court in Richmond seeking an injunction ordering the State Board of Elections to print presidential primary ballots with his name.

Perry filed suit in federal court Tuesday challenging his exclusion from the March 6 primary ballot, naming the three members of the elections board and Pat Mullins, chairman of the state Republican Party.

Perry is urging a judge to bar the elections board and Mullins from enforcing the state residency requirement for people who collect petition signatures for ballot access.

(Excerpt) Read more at 2.timesdispatch.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gopprimary; lawsuitabuse; perry2012; statesrights; vaballot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
Perry lawyers ask judge for emergency stay to block ballot printing....

Perry's lawyers said a preliminary injunction was necessary since the deadline to print ballots in Virginia will be in two to three weeks.

“In the absence of a preliminary injunction, plaintiff will suffer irreparable harm,” per filing.

The case is Perry v. Judd, 3:11-cv-856, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia in Richmond.

Source

1 posted on 12/28/2011 1:11:08 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

More power to him. He and Newt got screwed by the northeastern establishment Rinos including the VA Gubner. Oh, and don’t try to tell me that VA is part of the south. It’s not.


2 posted on 12/28/2011 1:17:32 PM PST by AdamBomb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdamBomb

It’s a D.C. Beltway electorate.


3 posted on 12/28/2011 1:19:10 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

So...they gamed the system by imposing a residency requirement on those who collected signatures...that’s how they said Newt and Perry didn’t have enough valid signatures. Very interesting...


4 posted on 12/28/2011 1:22:04 PM PST by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Perry v. Judd, 3:11-cv-856, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia in Richmond.
5 posted on 12/28/2011 1:24:17 PM PST by RedMDer (Forward With Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Question: Does any one know why Newt isn’t challenging this? Wouldn’t there be strength in numbers?

Why only Perry?


6 posted on 12/28/2011 1:25:46 PM PST by AdamBomb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

It was the VA GOP who eff’ed up by changing the rules (see below).

Every candidate signs an agreement before the election not to litigate intra-party disputes (no suing your own party).

The VA GOP announced that their Rules Committee would not meet in time to resolve the dispute by the state deadline (Dec 27). So Newt and Perry had no recourse within the party rules.

Perry’s only other option is to sue the state on broader constitutional grounds.


Here’s the timeline.

2008 Primary: The VA GOP (rpv.org) instructs all candidates to get 10000 sigs, with 15000 as a safety margin. This repeats the recommendations of the State Board of Elections. All candidates do submit 10000+ sigs. The VA GOP waives the requirement to verify the signatures and submits them without checking.

May 2011: The VA GOP instructs all candidates to get 10000+ sigs, with 15000 as a safety margin (same as 2008).

July 2011: Candidates are allowed to begin collecting signatures.

October 2011: Some guy named Osborne, who is running in a state election, files a lawsuit protesting that the no-check rule is unfair.

November 2011: In reaction to the lawsuit, the VA GOP decides to change the no-check rule for presidential primaries. They increase it from 10000 sigs to 15000 sigs. They send an electronic notice (e-mail or fax) to all candidates advising of the rule change.

For whatever reason Newt’s campaign didn’t get the notice. The e-mail/fax was never received or misrouted, unclear.

December 2011: The Gingrich campaign announces they have over 10000 sigs (the requirement) and are pushing for 15000 to meet the recommended number (see May above). At this point they believe they have breathing room. Getting 15000 is not essential just a good cushion so they aren’t too worried.

December 21, 2011: The VA GOP publishes an undated letter announcing the rule change.
http://tinyurl.com/8yxgw69

The PDF contains a hidden Microsoft Word creation date of 12/21/2011. This is the first public announcement of the rule change AFAIK.

Newt’s campaign freaks out at the surprise rule change (claims ‘Pearl Harbor’). Now getting 15,000 sigs isn’t nice-to-have but absolutely essential. Newt flies to VA to scramble to get 15,000 sigs.

Newt’s campaign turns in 11,500 sigs, short of the new rule’s 15,000 no-check requirement.

December 23: Because Newt/Perry are below 15,000 sigs the VA GOP runs the sigs through a computer-based address checking system. This has never been done before, not in 2008 nor prior primaries, for any candidate. Enough sigs are rejected to toss Newt and Perry off the ballot. The VA GOP announces this on Twitter.

December 27: The VA GOP turns in the final slate to the State Board of Elections.


7 posted on 12/28/2011 1:27:31 PM PST by Gideon7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedMDer

Thanks for finding the motion.


8 posted on 12/28/2011 1:28:24 PM PST by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AdamBomb
Why only Perry?

I think it is because Newt's campaign probably realizes that this was an internal party screwup.

9 posted on 12/28/2011 1:29:33 PM PST by Gideon7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RedMDer

Thank you.


10 posted on 12/28/2011 1:40:18 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7
Newt's campaign probably realizes that this was an internal party screwup.

Dat twasn't no screwup son. They were plainly screwed over. I guess the VA GOP likes Obama.

11 posted on 12/28/2011 1:41:20 PM PST by Drill Thrawl (The patient is too far gone to save.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
From a previous post:

The graceful way Perry accepted responsibility compared to the whining tantrum thrown by Gingrich, even promoting an illegal write-in campaign, says a lot about the character of the two men.

Never mind.

12 posted on 12/28/2011 1:41:33 PM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7

Wow! I have never seen that timeline before with so many interesting dates and facts. No wonder the Pearl Harbor reference by Newt. Hmmmm....Very suspicious Newt never got the change in rules when they sent them out!


13 posted on 12/28/2011 1:44:22 PM PST by sheikdetailfeather ("Kick The Communists Out Of Your Govt. And Don't Accept Their Goodies"-Yuri Bezmenov-KGB Defector)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7

Thank you.


14 posted on 12/28/2011 1:49:58 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AdamBomb

He says he’s going to get write-in signatures: fat chance!


15 posted on 12/28/2011 1:51:43 PM PST by upcountryhorseman (An old fashioned conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton

Virginia is a “swing” state and part of Super Tuesday. Texas (also Super Tuesday state) has been sidelined due to redistricting case going to the Supreme Court.


16 posted on 12/28/2011 1:52:46 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: upcountryhorseman

Write-ins are not allowed in VA primary elections.

“No write-in shall be permitted on ballots in primary elections.”

http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+24.2-529


17 posted on 12/28/2011 1:54:14 PM PST by Gideon7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AdamBomb

I just found this info (I don’t know how it plays into this).

WASHINGTON, D.C. —

A person hired to collect names to get Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich on the ballot for the Virginia primary turned in fraudulent signatures, Gingrich says.

“We hired somebody who turned in false signatures. We turned in 11,100 — we needed 10,000 — 1,500 of them were by one guy who frankly committed fraud,” Gingrich told a woman at a campaign stop in Algona, Iowa.

http://www2.tricities.com/news/2011/dec/28/gingrich-admits-person-he-hired-collect-signatures-ar-1573334/


18 posted on 12/28/2011 2:02:21 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Go Perry!


19 posted on 12/28/2011 2:16:46 PM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7
It was the VA GOP who eff’ed up by changing the rules (see below).

Nope it was just part of the plan to head of the rabble, works too.

20 posted on 12/28/2011 2:26:40 PM PST by itsahoot (Throw them all out! Especially the Frugal Socialists who call themselves Republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson