Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Marriage, New Family Finances: What's Fair
Townhall.com ^ | December 28, 2011 | Carrie Schwab Pomerantz

Posted on 12/28/2011 12:30:28 PM PST by Kaslin

Dear Carrie: I'm about to get married for the second time. I have two kids, 8 and 10, and my fiancee has two teenagers. Everyone gets along well, but my husband-to-be is a lot wealthier than I, and his kids have been raised with very different financial expectations.

It's not that I necessarily expect him to now pay for everything for my kids, but at the same time, I don't want them to feel like they get less because they're less worthy. What's fair in a situation like this? --A Reader

Dear Reader: Even the most compatible couple can have money problems and blending a family can raise even bigger issues. What's "fair" may be different to different couples, so it's crucial that you and your fiancee have a heart-to-heart now -- so that you can find what feels right to the two of you.

Talking it out is especially important because this isn't just about numbers. It's about your feelings and your values -- the "glue" that will hold you together as a family. So be open about your feelings. Trust me, by dealing with all these topics openly and honestly now, you can avoid some real heartache down the road.

Also, you don't mention if your ex-spouses are in the picture. If they are, your situation may be even more complicated, so start talking right away.

START WITH THE TWO OF YOU

Right from the start it's important for both of you to reveal exactly how what you own and anything you owe. Full disclosure is essential!

Next talk about how you'll "marry" your finances. There's no one-size-fits-all formula for everyone, but talk about who will pay for what and which assets you intend to combine and which you plan to keep separate. Just as an example, if one of you owns a home, will the other buy in?

Also discuss accounts. To me, a certain amount of financial independence is a good thing. In fact, I often recommend a "yours, mine and ours" approach so that both partners have some autonomy but also work as a team. It's best if both have the same amount of discretionary money even if one earns more.

And finally, how will you split up the financial chores? It's fine if one of you is more involved in your finances on a day-to-day basis, but you should both be involved in all the big decisions.

TALK ABOUT THE VALUES YOU WANT TO IMPART TO THE KIDS

You say your fiancee's kids have different financial expectations. That's understandable. However, that doesn't mean your financial values are necessarily different. Discuss what you expect of all the kids. Will they get an allowance? Do you want them to contribute to personal expenses or special costs like a car or a school trip? Will you encourage them to get summer jobs?

If you want to be a cohesive unit, I believe all the kids have to be treated the same -- with the same privileges and responsibilities. For instance, you can't buy cars for one set of kids and not the other without creating resentment.

Once you come to an agreement, talk to the kids. They all need to understand what you expect from them and what they can expect from you. It's probably best to do this as a group. Talk frankly about the new relationship, both the personal and the economic, and how you all can work together. Encourage them to express their feelings and make suggestions.

If it's possible, you each may want to talk to your former spouses about the approach you're taking and the values you want to impart. If there's a difference of opinion here, be honest about it with the kids so they don't feel confused.

CONFRONT COLLEGE COSTS

This could be particularly sticky. Once again, if you're really a family, I think the kids have to have the same opportunities. Since your fiancee's children are already teenagers, he may already have their college covered. Is he willing to contribute to your kids' education if necessary? What about your ex? Address this now and come up with a realistic college savings plan to avoid hard feelings later on.

DON'T SHY AWAY FROM ESTATE PLANNING

This is another time bomb that should be talked out now. Whether you include each other's children in your estate plans is a personal decision. But no matter if you decide to divide everything equally or keep your estates separate, at the appropriate time, make certain the children know the reality. Even the happiest family can become embittered by financial disappointments.

CONSIDER A PRENUP

If you haven't talked about a prenuptial agreement, now's the time. Even if you don't formalize it, putting things on paper will help you come to a genuine understanding. None of this is easy but, to me, your long-term happiness depends on it. Best of luck to all of you.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: finances; money; personalfinance

1 posted on 12/28/2011 12:30:29 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Apropos of this season of giving, Here is a link to a youtube video of song accompanying the whining of those ungrateful souls who posted their displeasure in their gifts. (language warning).
2 posted on 12/28/2011 12:36:57 PM PST by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The marriage-go-round is tricky enough. It’s even trickier for those who fall off their pony then decide to climb back up.


3 posted on 12/28/2011 12:39:14 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
To me, a certain amount of financial independence is a good thing. In fact, I often recommend a "yours, mine and ours" approach so that both partners have some autonomy but also work as a team. It's best if both have the same amount of discretionary money even if one earns more.

Couldn't disagree more. In fact, I find the paragraph contradictory. "A certain amount of financial independence" means "a certain amount", by my reading. By equalizing discretionary income regardless of earnings you aren't providing any independence to the higher earner. That's a recipe for resentment.

What you should do (if you choose not to pool all resources) is to assign a certain amount of non-discretionary obligation on both parts to cover living expenses. This can acknowledge disparities in income without creating a feeling of resentment. If Person 1 makes 60% of the household income and Person 2 40%, why not divide living expenses proportionally, assign additional proportional amounts to savings, and let each do what they want with the remainder?

4 posted on 12/28/2011 12:44:26 PM PST by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The woman already displays a sense of inferiority to her much wealthier fiance and has placed her kids in a second class category.

The ex-spouses and the kids’ other parents will add to the problem - no doubt.


5 posted on 12/28/2011 12:52:21 PM PST by sodpoodle ( Newt - God has tested him for a reason..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird
is to assign a certain amount of non-discretionary obligation on both parts to cover living expenses. .....You hit it, right in one.

Mrs WBill and I did roughly this, when we were both working. Worked fine. And, neither of us ever asked about the "discretionary" funds, unless something major ("Hey, I'm going to get a new car!") came up.

Worked like a champ.

Now that she's not working (as much), and I am ... things are a little stickier. But we still manage to figure it out. For instance, rather than give her an "allowance" (she's not 12, lol), I handle as much of her non-discretionary spending (gas, car payments, insurance) that I can. She has a lot less discretionary funding, but its her own, and it's not already spoken for with bills.

YMMV. But it's a system that works for us.

IMHO, the fastest way to wreck a relationship is to argue about money. If you each have your own, then there's nothing to argue about, ever.

6 posted on 12/28/2011 12:54:54 PM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle

“What’s fair in a situation like this? “

Put all the brats up for adoption, and start off fresh! /


7 posted on 12/28/2011 1:10:40 PM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

ROTFL!!!!


8 posted on 12/28/2011 1:16:58 PM PST by sodpoodle ( Newt - God has tested him for a reason..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle
The ex-spouses and the kids’ other parents will add to the problem - no doubt.

I and my wife were Step-parents to each others children. If you don't get on the same page and quick, the children will tear you apart.

For this situation, I would suggest a Dave Ramsey ELP and a Psychological Counselor pronto. Good they are tackling this now before it becomes major trouble.

Again, for Step-Parents, get on the same page quick and stay there!

As for a Prenup, Dave would remind you that a Prenup only works for Assets held BEFORE the marriage. Assets after the marriage get split in divorces and the Prenup will not help then.

I DO NOT RECOMMEND A PRENUP. They setup a fault line in the marriage that money is more important than people. In Marriage you should be ALL IN with 100% commitment or not at all.

However, if it is children's assets that may be a different story.

9 posted on 12/28/2011 1:36:31 PM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wbill

My younger sister recently remarried after being a widow for about 10 years, she doesn’t live near me and I don’t see her very often. She has what I consider a very healthy income, owns her paid for home and so does her new husband have all that too. Each has one adult child and 3 grand children.

Right now they stay in her house part time and in his house part time. I’m really curious about what they will do about the housing situation but I consider that to be one of those “not my business things”. Looks to me like they would eventually sell one of them. They are both equally nice houses.


10 posted on 12/28/2011 1:40:34 PM PST by Graybeard58 (No Obama, No Romney, No Paul, No Huntsman. We can do better than that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
My unsolicted $0.02? They ought to sell both houses and use the proceeds to buy their own.

No matter which house they choose, the other person will always be a "guest" there.

But you're right - that's a good one to stay out of. :-)

11 posted on 12/28/2011 2:13:17 PM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

I would also put the parents up for adoption.


12 posted on 12/28/2011 2:16:34 PM PST by MIchaelTArchangel (Obama means crooked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wbill

I think your advice to sell both houses and purchase one together is brilliant. You are a regular Dear Abby, Wbill!


13 posted on 12/28/2011 4:43:20 PM PST by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

My advice is for them to visit a lawyer, to tell them exactly what their rights and obligations are under the law if they do nothing. and if that isn’t what they want, how to make things as they intend.


14 posted on 12/28/2011 6:51:11 PM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Author of BullionBible.com - Makes You a Precious Metal Expert, Guaranteed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson