Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: outofstyle

Im not a fan of the inside job theory. But as an engineer I do question how a building can fall at near free fall speed without it being a controlled detonation(lower floors begin to fall before upper floors resulting in free fall speed). The explanation given was a pancake effect which means that upper floors hit lower ones and made them fall from the weight, which means alot of resistance and would take alot longer than freefall speed to come crashing down.
Alot of people are either too naive or just dont want to believe it that black bag operations are done and have been done in the past to further international efforts.
Im speaking from an engineering stand point,and there are many engineering and architechtural professionals that agree with the assessment that the buildings were taken down via controlled demolition. This doesnt mean that the attacks didnt happen by the perpetrators, simply that the buildings had to have had critical support colums destroyed at specific intervals so as to have lower floors give way before the upper floors came crashing down.


45 posted on 12/27/2011 10:03:25 PM PST by hannibaal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: hannibaal

Do you honestly have any idea what’s required for a controlled detonation? There would have had to be teams of explosives experts all over those two buildings for weeks to set up such a thing. Do you really believe no one would have noticed that? If you do, you’re as looney as all the other conspiracy theorists, “speaking from an engineering stand point” or not.


46 posted on 12/27/2011 10:48:13 PM PST by Doug Loss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson