Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe

Well, you’re obviously not a lawyer who practices in VA or you’d know it’s a LAW here that establishes qualifications to be on the ballot. The state parties certify the petitions, but don’t write election laws. This isn’t Massachusetts.


254 posted on 12/24/2011 12:29:11 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]


To: EDINVA; Jim Robinson; C. Edmund Wright; xzins; kabar; PSYCHO-FREEP; P-Marlowe; wmfights
Well, you’re obviously not a lawyer who practices in VA or you’d know it’s a LAW here that establishes qualifications to be on the ballot.

True but it is the party that certifies the petitions and apparently this is the first time in VA history that the VA GOP actually bothered to cross check the addresses. The fact that they have never bothered before makes the application of the law in this case arbitrary.

If the law is applied in an arbitrary manner the law is unconstitutional. Also if it does not advance a legitimate legislative goal or it is irrational in substance or application it violates the Equal Protection clause. I have made my arguments on this thread as to why that is the case.

There are several reasons why this law is unconstitutional. But in this case it has clearly been unconstitutionally applied.

257 posted on 12/24/2011 12:38:02 PM PST by P-Marlowe (Merry Christmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson