Aha. Now we are learning something. This check was done by computer, and for the first time. And all candidates who applied for certifiaction were rejected.
Could be due to an overly-strict address match algorithm. For example if your actual street address is "1234 N Main St" but you wrote down "1234 Main" you got rejected.
New computerized process. Done for the first time. Rejects ALL candidates who used it. It's a process problem/glitch.
First we heard that Newt lost 2000 signatures due to lack of address. Now we hear that there were addresses, they just didn't match the database. Three points:
Did Perry and Newt have anyone observing the verification process. If so, wonder what they have to say?
Second, Was there really enough time to compare all these addresses, or could human error have occurred during the process?
Third, which address is actually correct? The database or the one on the forms? Can GOP just assume their database is correct and disqualify automatically, or do they have to make some effort to determine the truth?
In St. Louis, if memory serves, the court ruled that you can not just toss the ballots due to address discrepancies or something, so I'm thinking this may not be over.
However, Perry and Newt will both benefit from getting this matter dealt with quickly and off the front page Headlines.