Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Citing Gableman, Dane County DA might renew case against anti-union law
Associated Propaganda ^ | 12-22-11 | Scott Bauer

Posted on 12/23/2011 6:12:53 AM PST by WOBBLY BOB

The district attorney who filed a lawsuit challenging Wisconsin's law passed this year effectively ending collective bargaining rights for most public workers said Thursday he is considering asking the state Supreme Court to rehear the case.

Dane County District Attorney Ismael Ozanne told the Associated Press he was looking at making the request after learning that Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman had received free legal services from a firm that defended the law in that case decided in June.

Gableman was part of a four-justice majority that upheld the law, which generated massive opposition protests and made Wisconsin the center of the national fight over union rights.

There's no guarantee the court would agree to rehear the case even if Gableman did not participate in making that decision. If no other justice changed their opinion on the case, a 3-3 deadlock would be possible and it would not be heard again.

(Excerpt) Read more at twincities.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: afscme; court; dane; fleebaggers; recall; unions; walker; weac; wi; wisconsinshowdown
here we go again...
1 posted on 12/23/2011 6:12:57 AM PST by WOBBLY BOB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WOBBLY BOB
The rats continue to refer to collective bargaining as a ‘right’. It is not a right but at best a privilege.
2 posted on 12/23/2011 6:20:39 AM PST by JPG (Growing old is mandatory; growing up is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WOBBLY BOB

This is similar to the Kagan recusal issue on Obamacare: a tie vote upholds the law. If the Wisconsin justice recuses himself and the rest vote the same way, it’s 3-3 and the law is upheld. If Kagan recuses herself it doesn’t change anything — 4-4 with Kennedy voting to uphold means the law is upheld. 5-3 with Kennedy voting to overturn means it’s struck down. It’s still in Kennedy’s hands barring some surprise twist.

In both cases the recusal isn’t meaningful unless some justices vote differently than expected.


3 posted on 12/23/2011 6:25:20 AM PST by Numbers Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WOBBLY BOB
The rats never, every give up. Us? We fold when the Black Panther President calls us meanies.

Speaking of folding, the House of Scared Pubbies today will probably give unanimous consent to Dingy Harry's take-it-or-leave-it ultimatum. It would be improper for the people's House to delay Dear Leader's extravagant, taxpayer paid vacation.

4 posted on 12/23/2011 6:37:56 AM PST by Jacquerie (No court will save us from ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JPG

Since Ann Walsh Bradley and Shirley Abrahamson accepted millions....MILLIONS in campaign contributions from AFSCME and WEAC when they were running for election, can we ask them to step aside as well?


5 posted on 12/23/2011 7:15:58 AM PST by irish guard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WOBBLY BOB; Hunton Peck; Diana in Wisconsin; TaMoDee; P from Sheb; Shady; DonkeyBonker; ...

Wisconsin “do-over” ping.

Geeeesh! These people make me sick. They want to do-over every election that dies not suit them and every judicial decision that is against their interest.


6 posted on 12/23/2011 7:18:50 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

The decison has been made, “Done is Done” so get over it.


7 posted on 12/23/2011 7:41:50 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WOBBLY BOB
To my Wisconsin friends in this Merry Christmas season I quote the great G.K. Chesterton in the hope you will remain united in defiance of these progressive idiots: “The one perfectly divine thing, the one glimpse of God's paradise given on earth, is to fight a losing battle - and not lose it.” ― G.K. Chesterton
8 posted on 12/23/2011 7:55:37 AM PST by februus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

I heard an analysis this morning that the fact that they’re trying to pull this crap is an indication that they’re not feeling too well about their recall chances. If Gableman recuses himself, he should be kicked off the court for simply being an idiot. I don’t think he’s due for reelection for 5 or six years anyway, so why should he recuse himself?


9 posted on 12/23/2011 12:33:16 PM PST by creeping death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WOBBLY BOB

For the benefit of those playing at home (i.e., not in Wisconsin), the State Capitol is located in Dane County. Dane County is perhaps as liberal as Ann Arbor or Berkley, and the County DA, while nominally a non-partisan position, is almost always held by a liberal Democrat. The state law and civil procedure typically fix jurisdiction over state government functions in the Dane County - assuming that if the Capitol, the legislature and the Supreme Court are there, it must be the appropriate jurisdiction. So, you get this hack yahoo Ozanne involved repeatedly as an attack on Walker. If the law were to make a random assignment of complaints to DA’s and courts in outlying counties, this nonsense wouldn’t get very far.


10 posted on 12/23/2011 4:20:40 PM PST by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

Scott Walker details $123.2 million in budget cuts

more gloom and doom from scotty bauer

http://www.twincities.com/ci_19609940


11 posted on 12/24/2011 7:47:10 AM PST by WOBBLY BOB (Congress: Looting the future to bribe the present.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

Scott Walker details $123.2 million in budget cuts

more gloom and doom from scotty bauer

http://www.twincities.com/ci_19609940


12 posted on 12/24/2011 7:47:10 AM PST by WOBBLY BOB (Congress: Looting the future to bribe the present.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson