Posted on 12/21/2011 6:55:21 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Via Mediaite, the same bit jumped out at me as jumped out at Ace:
Borger: “These things are pretty incendiary.”
Paul: “That’s because of people like you.”
Really? Only liberal/media types should find the newsletters offensive? He can’t mean that because he keeps saying that he disavows the content. I think he means that the newsletters are water under bridge which everyone rightly should, and would, never mention again if not for the media repeatedly bringing them up. Which is interesting for a few reasons. One: Every other candidate’s dirty laundry has been aired and re-aired over the past few months and no one else has enjoyed an “asked and answered” defense. How many thousand times has Perry been pressed to apologize for his dumb debate remark about immigration hawks being heartless, for instance? Two: As Dave Weigel notes, Paul actually hasn’t answered all the questions asked about the newsletters. He won’t say who wrote them or whether he still associates with the author. All he knows is that none of this is fair game anymore, which goes even further than Obama did when he tried to dismiss an obnoxious association of his own.
Three: Until this week, when his odds of winning Iowa suddenly started to look real, Paul’s gotten an almost total pass from the media on this. Partly that’s because he used to look like a longshot who wasn’t worth bothering about and partly it’s because the media admires him as a Republican who hates other Republicans, especially when it comes to foreign policy. By the end here, in fact, Borger seems almost apologetic in having had to ask about it. Would any other conservative, save possibly Huntsman, have drawn that tone from a reporter in a line of questioning about racism? And four: To echo a point Ed made a few days ago, if Romney or Perry or Gingrich had these newsletters on their resume, they’d be dead on arrival. Even if primary voters believed their “didn’t write ‘em, never saw ‘em” explanation, they’d be perceived as unelectable against Obama and therefore un-nominatable. Paul, ironically, gets some leeway from people on this, I think, because he’s already perceived as unelectable and un-nominatable (except by his core supporters, of course). Why beat him up over an old disgrace when he’s about to have a moment in the sun in Iowa and then fade?
For what it’s worth, his answer here tracks perfectly with the reactions I typically see from Paul fans in blog comment threads whenever the newsletters come up. It’s never a matter of “yes, they’re disturbing and absolutely fair game, but we need to elect Paul anyway because we desperately need his fiscal discipline.” Rather, it’s always a case of “Meh, old news. This again?” Good luck in the general election, guys. Exit quotation from Philip Klein: “Ron Paul transparency: Bradley Manning is a hero for leaking classified info, but don’t dare ask who wrote my newsletters!”
Update: Ed e-mails to ask if I can recall another presidential candidate walking out of an interview with a mainstream news outlet. I’m sure it’s happened, but I honestly can’t think of an example. Anyone?
Update: A reader e-mails that it looks to him like the interview was already over when Paul started pulling his mic off and that Borger simply kept asking questions, i.e. that he didn’t actually walk out. Hard to tell, but duly noted. Either way, Paul’s displeasure is obvious.
Right. Republicans tend to get hung up on racial guilt. Democrats use this weakness to bully Republicans, but never get hung up themselves. Ron and Rand Paul dismiss and therefore do not get hung up on racial guilt.
Ain't that the truth. The left and the mushy right are in a battle to be the most politically correct and point out the 'racist'. Meanwhile race political, lobby and social groups of every race but white are pushing their agenda. Not to mention we have a GD America, Black Panther supporting white hater and his supporting cast in the White House. Time to go back to sleep.
“This kind of disavowal smacks of Obama sitting on Rev. Wright’s pew for many years and then telling us that he never heard him spout his anti-America rhetoric even once.”
Exactly. Obama successfully blew off the Rev. Wright issue just like Paul routinely does with the newsletter issue.
“I never thought I’d find FReepers so “concerned” about racism.”
LOL
RE: I never thought I’d find FReepers so “concerned” about racism
RIGHTLY DEFINED, YES. FReepers believe that racism does exist.
However, FR is not like Find-racism-under-every-tree Jesse Jerkson or Al Sharpie.
He’s done that before and lost.......
http://caucuses.desmoinesregister.com/2011/12/22/ron-pauls-story-changes-on-racial-comments/
Wow, that's a mighty Democrat thing to say.
Real conservatives detest racists. That's why we despise all the quota garbage and make fun of Jesse Jackson.
We believe God created everyone uniquely; but not based on skin color.
Everyone gets equal opportunity; skin color doesn't matter. No quotas, etc.
But we realize cultural stuff has done it's part to segment people by race in some circumstances, and to cause some bad behaviors (inner city crime). The differences arte not due to skin color however; it's the toxic environment some are used to.
A young white kid would react exactly the same way as a young black kid, all other things being equal.
Now when we run into a real racist; one that really believes someone is inferior due to race or skin color; we have a big problem with those people.
“He’s done that before and lost.......”
Sure did. Maybe he’s thinking second time is the charm.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.