Must have been a retread.
Posted on 12/21/2011 6:16:23 AM PST by TBBT
Bombshell legal documents reveal the tawdry truth about GOP Presidential contender NEWT GINGRICH’s dark past – his father was a wife-beater, a wife cheater and perennial drunk!
And in an even more shocking disclosure, Newt’s mother asserts in the explosive documents that she was battered by her husband while pregnant with the future Speaker of the House.
Despite those horrific charges, insiders reveal that Newt forgave his dad and they became fast friends.
Now sources say the 68-year-old White House contender’s close relationship with his violent father is bound to ignite a new scandal because the veteran politician has been a major crusader against domestic violence – and even co-sponsored the Violence Against Women Act in 1994.
A political source told The ENQUIRER: “Newt is going to face some heavy questioning because while he’s been a major opponent of domestic violence, he secretly reconciled with his wife-beating father.”
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalenquirer.com ...
Who can control or manage the actions of a parent—or both parents—even BEFORE they are born?
Based on this I vow never to vote for Newt’s dad.
I’m sitting tight until O’Reilly loads this news into his talking points.
Then I’ll freak out! /s
BTW Newt schooled the fool last night.
Did he? I didn't know he was going to be on, or I would have suspended my "No O'Reilly Zone" for a few minutes and tuned in.
Such a reputable source.... NOT
Sounds like Bubba daddy
It is you that is the fool.
As for “Violence Against Women Act in 1994”, men that beat their women deserve all that our system can dump on them. Same with women that are violent with their men, although that occurs less often than the former.
Regardless, the VAWA has nothing to do with this thread.
“True conservatives” don’t beat the ones they love. True conservatives don’t support violence against those that can’t protect themselves.
I see you’re yet another lazy pseudo-conservative who looks at the title of legislation and assumes it is in fact what the legislation was designed to do. How sad.
According to your definition, Phyllis Schlafly and the other legions of conservative women who have exposed VAWA for what it is and actively fight against it must be in favor of beating women.
Got it, Einstein!
Must have been a retread.
And you are a reputable source?
http://www.freerepublic.com/~xkcd2/
Yeah, that’s reputable.
Retread, it’s what’s for dinner.
To be added or removed from the Viking Kitty/ZOT Ping List, FReepmail Darkwing104 or 50mm.
"DARKEST"? If that's all the National Enquirer has, it's lying, incompetent, or endorsing Newt.The Rovian Death Star is firing all phaser arrays.
Apparently Romney is universally desired by the elites.
Rush today cites Romney to O'Reilly refusing to call Obama a socialist.
While George Will calls Newt a Marxist.
Boy I remember that Marxist was a lot different from the one doubling our national debt now.
Does no one recall Obama's alleged white grandfather and the CPUSA Frank Marshall Davis' whiskey and marijuana parties with the young Barry?
No wonder Michelle takes a separate vacation.
When every ack-ack is trained on you, you're on the beam.
Totally agree.
I looked but couldn’t see what caused the NOT...
Great graphic, Sarge! Love it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.