Replies

If he drops his opposition to illegal immigration enforcement, call me again.

Perry has been demanding enforcement; wants the border sealed; wants the cartels killed off; say's NO amnesty.

Well, everybody including Obama say that they want to secure the border, so it does not mean anything.

I know there are few proven enforcement tools:
1: e-verify
2: fence
3: strict state laws, like those in AL, AZ

He is against all of them. Instead, he supports tax subsidies for illegals and has been in touch with hate group La Raza. Imaginary wall is the non-solution supported by all amnesty activists since they know it does not work and besides, future admins can end it anytime.

Perry has been demanding enforcement; wants the border sealed; wants the cartels killed off; say's NO amnesty.

And yet he is still:

1. Against the use of E-Verify to disallow employment or tax-payer funded benefits to Illegals
2. Against a PHYSICAL border fence
3. Against Interior Enforcement at the state level AKA AZ1070.
4. Has a quasi-Sanctuary policy at the State Level with the State Policy.
5. Has taken large donations from corporate and other donors whose business model depends on the unlimited supply of a stable cheap illegal workforce subsidized by Taxpayers.

Get back to me when his positions on the border issues firm up and I'll support him, until then, don't lie about him being against Illegal Immigration.