To: indianrightwinger
It would be no more appropriate for Congress to subpoena a federal judge (or that judge’s clerks) about the reasoning of one of the judge’s rulings than it would be for Congress to subpoena the president (or his top advisors) about a controversial decision that was within the president’s constitutional authority,Um, Congress did exactly that to Nixon and GW Bush (re the perfectly Constitutional firing of 8 DOiJ attorneys). And the courts upheld it.
This author is clearly ignorant of the law and history...
14 posted on
12/19/2011 11:08:28 AM PST by
piytar
(The Obama Depression. Say it early, say it often. Why? Because it's TRUE.)
To: piytar
Google the author’s name...ignorant he is not. Shall we do the same with your real name?
To: piytar
Um, Congress did exactly that to Nixon and GW Bush (re the perfectly Constitutional firing of 8 DOiJ attorneys). And the courts upheld it. A point I made in a comment at NRO, where said comment was evidently not approved because it so concisely showed the author to be a complete dunce.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson