Google the author’s name...ignorant he is not. Shall we do the same with your real name?
He is in this case.
Why not address the point re the subpeonaing of Nixon and GW’s top advisors comopletely shredding his flase premise? Or would you rather stick with an implied threat to expose my real name, which could cost me many clients who are obamabots? (Hey, their money is green, too, and I’ve even converted a few.)
If he is not ignorant of the law and history, as you say, then he is lying.
Re-reading this, you were not implying that you had or could Google my real name. My bad...