Motivated by political considerations to be sure.
To: freespirited
Wait a minute—isn’t all of this garbage designated in the bill as law? What moves would the hussein administration have to now make it states decisions?
2 posted on
12/18/2011 1:38:29 PM PST by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
To: freespirited
“If you like your coverage, you can keep it.”
President Obama.
So what if the state defines a coverage which doesn’t agree with your policy....SOL. The state gets the flack while DC comes out like a rose.
3 posted on
12/18/2011 1:38:59 PM PST by
ak267
At any point, HHS can change the rules (quickly or subtlely) to suit their needs.
4 posted on
12/18/2011 1:40:59 PM PST by
ak267
To: freespirited
Obama to let states decide benefit levels under health law IF he's reelected and 0bamacare isn't sh!tcanned.
5 posted on
12/18/2011 1:42:13 PM PST by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: freespirited
Then this should void the whole crap sandwich.
6 posted on
12/18/2011 1:44:42 PM PST by
Jane Long
(Soli Deo Gloria!)
To: freespirited
It's still unconstitutional.
7 posted on
12/18/2011 1:46:19 PM PST by
tobyhill
(Obama, The Biggest Thief In American History)
To: freespirited
So, Obma decided that all on his own did he? Who say’s we don’t have a Monarchy here.
8 posted on
12/18/2011 1:49:22 PM PST by
Venturer
To: freespirited
He is failing to announce what everyone forgets.hidden in his ObamaCare are a lot of nanny state things but ONE NATIONAL ID CARD per person is one of them.And why is it some of ObamaCares laws are enacted (I hear the part about all kids covered until they are 26 is?)
To: freespirited
And... he can just change is mind.
wow.
To: freespirited
How does that guy "let" anything happen?
Where does he get that authority?
Why does he think he can "let" anything happen?
This nation is a mess.
To: freespirited
So I guess some states won’t have to cover sex change operations?
To: freespirited
That’s mighty white of him.
18 posted on
12/18/2011 2:12:32 PM PST by
printhead
(Standard & Poor - Poor is the new standard.)
To: freespirited
This is only to get it firmly into law. Then, some liberal will start a suit to push for federal control as "the 'quiltwork' approach just isn't working! State A enforces it, but State B does not, depriving residents of State B their healthcare 'rights'."
It'll happen if we let it folks....
19 posted on
12/18/2011 2:24:03 PM PST by
jeffc
(Prayer. It's freedom of speech.)
To: freespirited
Bullcrap.
He’s issuing guidelines.
They can change guidelines on a whim.
They are not THE LAW THAT WAS PASSED.
21 posted on
12/18/2011 3:20:44 PM PST by
Secret Agent Man
(I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
To: freespirited
With ANYTHING Obama, there should NEVER be ANY compromise, EVER.
FUBO.......
25 posted on
12/18/2011 4:04:31 PM PST by
Gator113
(~Just livin' life, my way~.. Newt/Palin-West-2012."got a lot swirling around in my head.")
To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...
26 posted on
12/18/2011 4:35:09 PM PST by
Nachum
(The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
To: freespirited
It’s still unconstitutional.
He knows it. This is his way to try to get it passed the Supreme Court.
What a mess.
To: freespirited
“Motivated by political considerations to be sure.”
EXACTLY! So typical of the Leftist mindset.
30 posted on
12/18/2011 4:59:00 PM PST by
rockinqsranch
(Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
To: freespirited
Lipstick on a pig, is still a pig. You would think he would at least be starting to get a glimmer of understanding that we are not as stupid as he thinks. Or, he simply doesn’t care.
32 posted on
12/18/2011 6:28:21 PM PST by
ODC-GIRL
(We live in interesting times)
To: freespirited
federal gov’t giveth, federal gov’t can just as easily take it away
34 posted on
12/18/2011 7:25:03 PM PST by
Godzilla
(3/7/77)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson