I hope these people are prepared and that Orly is NOT part of these proceedings. The Supreme Court IS the legal precedent here, so as long as they cite that as the primary factor, there’s no solid legal footing NOT to follow that actual guidance.
C. Different Legal Theories
Plaintiff Welden’s legal theory relies upon one substantive fact, which has beenrepeatedly and publically admitted by the Defendant, and one definition from the SupremeCourt.
See Minor v. Happersett , 88 U.S. 162, 167 (1875). The other Plaintiffs intend to assertmultiple legal theories including fraud, identify theft, and others.