C. Different Legal Theories
Plaintiff Welden’s legal theory relies upon one substantive fact, which has beenrepeatedly and publically admitted by the Defendant, and one definition from the SupremeCourt.
See Minor v. Happersett , 88 U.S. 162, 167 (1875). The other Plaintiffs intend to assertmultiple legal theories including fraud, identify theft, and others.
C. Different Legal TheoriesPlaintiff Welden’s legal theory relies upon one substantive fact, which has beenrepeatedly and publically admitted by the Defendant, and one definition from the SupremeCourt.
See Minor v. Happersett , 88 U.S. 162, 167 (1875). The other Plaintiffs intend to assertmultiple legal theories including fraud, identify theft, and others.
So why not accept my counter-challenge?
For me to win my counter-challenge *all* those legal theories must lose. If you like Welden's argument, great. If he wins in court, you win against me. Are you game, or do you cower away?
Whether or not you have the stones, I'm on record: "I bet Obama wins the challenge in Georgia and appears on the ballot."