We just oppose ILLEGAL immigration. People who break the law should not be given preferential treatment over people who follow the law.
I wonder if there’s any reason the writer repeatedly mentions ‘immigration’ when he is really referring to ‘ILLEGAL immigration’.
Well, New York Times is excited about Amnesty-Newt. THis should go on well /s
To the Newt-trolls here:
Newt is for amnesty, which is legalization of illegals. The details of his campaign time plan are not important. They will be fine-tuned with Senate’s ACORN caucus before the bill is signed, i.e. something betwene Newt’s amnesty and ACORN’s amnesty idea. You can be sure that Tea Parties (i.e. radical righwingers) will not be invited to those meetings.
Courts and future admins will fine-tune it further (guess which way).
In the past, Newt blocked e-verify.
He is unacceptable amnesty hack, the biggest threat to our country. Everything else can be changed in the future. Amnesty is permanently changing the country.
Choice is yours.
Well, New York Times is excited about Amnesty-Newt. THis should go on well /s
To the Newt-trolls here:
Newt is for amnesty, which is legalization of illegals. The details of his campaign time plan are not important. They will be fine-tuned with Senate’s ACORN caucus before the bill is signed, i.e. something betwene Newt’s amnesty and ACORN’s amnesty idea. You can be sure that Tea Parties (i.e. radical righwingers) will not be invited to those meetings.
Courts and future admins will fine-tune it further (guess which way).
In the past, Newt blocked e-verify.
He is unacceptable amnesty hack, the biggest threat to our country. Everything else can be changed in the future. Amnesty is permanently changing the country.
Choice is yours.
The bad Newt