Well, New York Times is excited about Amnesty-Newt. THis should go on well /s
To the Newt-trolls here:
Newt is for amnesty, which is legalization of illegals. The details of his campaign time plan are not important. They will be fine-tuned with Senate’s ACORN caucus before the bill is signed, i.e. something betwene Newt’s amnesty and ACORN’s amnesty idea. You can be sure that Tea Parties (i.e. radical righwingers) will not be invited to those meetings.
Courts and future admins will fine-tune it further (guess which way).
In the past, Newt blocked e-verify.
He is unacceptable amnesty hack, the biggest threat to our country. Everything else can be changed in the future. Amnesty is permanently changing the country.
Choice is yours.
There is nothing implicitly bad about "legalization". What is bad is "a path to citizenship". I'm OK with "legalization" if the most it involves is permanent residency with NO path to citizenship (i.e. if you accept it, you will NEVER be allowed citizen status, NEVER vote for a (Democrat) candidate for office). Your children will become citizens if born here. No "go back to your home country and apply (ahead of others who have NOT violated US law)". Just permanent residency (call it a "red card").
And of course, the borders MUST be secured FIRST. And I mean PROVEN secured by a 90% drop in attempts to cross (99% would be better).
Newt is NOT for amnesty. Wake up. Spreading this garbage does not do America any good.
This is critical. Whether Obamacare gets repealed next year or four years from now, it can always be reversed. Amnesty, on the other hand, is forever. Obama cannot get amnesty passed, this is clear. However, Gingrich just might be able to get amnesty passed with the help of the weak, effete, Republican elite and the Democrats. If this happens, 20 million new, uneducated, government dependent, Democrat voters will insure there will not be a conservative "revolution" for many generations, if ever. In this, on of the most important issues facing our Country, Gingrich poses a greater threat than Obama.
I am concerned about the prospect of four more years of Obama, although he could be reigned in if we had Republican leadership with guts. I am fearful that Gingrich will place our Country permanently in jeopardy. This is the dilemma Gingrich supporters have not addressed.