Disputation the evidence itself? None from you, because you know that the info is available from a number of sources:
There are a multitude of links from neutral sources that says Former Bush Treasury Secretary O"Neal stated that Bush wardrums for Iraq began before 9/11 --Hell, even the inquiry by the British Government on their involvement with Iraq corroborated that.
The Committee for the Liberation of Iraq Take your pick of sources on the one -- very real -- and BTW Newt Gingrich was a member.
And I am sure that you can find some "communist aspersions" to cast on a Youtube video of a George Bush speech -- have at it -- it's what people to lazy to actually debate facts do.
I don't have to defend Ron Paul. He explains his "glee" comment from about the 5 minute mark to 6:40 here. But then again it's just so much more fun to ignore what he means and make it up yourself.
The point is that you can agree or disagree on whether "glee" should have been the right word, but Ron Paul's comment was based on some very real verifiable events, statements, timelines and relationships -- not just some crap out of nowhere, and off the top of his head. It's reality based.
“I don’t have to defend Ron Paul.”
You can’t. It’s impossible. RuPaul’s stupidity is indefensible.
“I don’t have to defend Ron Paul.”
You can’t. It’s impossible. RuPaul’s stupidity is indefensible.