Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/08/2011 11:43:58 PM PST by Fred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Fred

He got the brilliant idea after watching a Tennessee Tuxedo and Chumley cartoon. This guy is going to give Joe Biden a run for his money in the stupid quotes sweepstakes.


2 posted on 12/09/2011 12:05:11 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred
1) Build “a large array of mirrors [that] could affect the earth’s climate,” to extend farmers’ growing season.

Oh sheesh, it sounds like he read Stephenie Meyer's book, The Host.

3 posted on 12/09/2011 12:08:04 AM PST by sockmonkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Is Debbie Schlussel lying about Newt Gingrich and his upcoming Global Warming book in this article on her website ?
4 posted on 12/09/2011 12:16:09 AM PST by pyx (Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred
1) Build “a large array of mirrors [that] could affect the earth’s climate,” to extend farmers’ growing season.


5 posted on 12/09/2011 12:20:27 AM PST by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred

Where are all the Ron Paul haters? Who is goofy now?


6 posted on 12/09/2011 12:28:34 AM PST by cowtowney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred

I’m all for using science to improve the environment. Legitimately reducing pollution, improving water quality, using resources more efficiently, and finding more effective means of power generation are laudable goals worthy of investment.

Where the line needs to be drawn is when dangerously misguided political agendas are substituted for science, poorly-understood technologies are introduced based on ideology instead of effectiveness and without regard for the consequences, and environmental regulations are imposed to promote social outcomes instead of solving legitimate environmental issues.

I fully support research into biodiesel and other alternative fuels, as well as solar and wind power. However, I recognize that all of these technologies are in their infancy, and therefore are far from being viable in the marketplace as of yet. I also support *proper* resource management, waste reduction, and environmental regulations. I don’t want factories dumping raw waste into waterways. I want to see methods of more efficiently using water. I want to see managed forests, as all of these things (eventually) benefit me and my family. I’d love to have the day come again when one could drink from a clear stream without worrying about getting sick from it.


7 posted on 12/09/2011 12:40:40 AM PST by Little Pig (Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred

Sounds like Newt could test his theory on MythBusters. Oh! Maybe not! If MythBusters can shoot cannon balls through people’s homes, think what they would do with a couple of mirrors!


8 posted on 12/09/2011 12:52:21 AM PST by jonrick46 (2012 can't come soon enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred

Sheesh!


9 posted on 12/09/2011 1:25:10 AM PST by exnavy (May the Lord bless and keep our troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred
Seems far far-fetched in re changing climate, but an Italian village uses a giant mirror to bring in some sunlight during the winter.

"The southern side of the valley is so sheer that on 11 November the sun disappears and does not reappear until 2 February."


11 posted on 12/09/2011 1:55:40 AM PST by caveat emptor (America is on a temporary leave of absence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred

I do not know in what context Newt talks about the mirrors - I suppose it is mostly experimental - but among his main proposals for right now are:
“drill here, drill now, pay less”
and “ending the EPA”
and “increasing nuclear energy.”


12 posted on 12/09/2011 2:18:08 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred

Thinking outside the box, that is just what we need in DC. Engineers of course would need to evaluate the practicality. Newt, with this idea, invokes the first phase of a very successful creative problem solving paradigm: Spin out ideas uncritically, followed with the second phase, critical analysis of the spun thoughts.


13 posted on 12/09/2011 2:40:23 AM PST by GregoryFul (Obama - Jim Jones redux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Daily Caller wants Mitt.


15 posted on 12/09/2011 2:57:51 AM PST by Happy Rain ("The Founders obviously anticipated Obama when they crafted the 2nd Amendment.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred

This is not free market capitalism!

JimRob...you really support this guy?


19 posted on 12/09/2011 3:42:21 AM PST by PjhCPA (I'm an equal candidate criticizer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fred
he thinks government can incentivize the production of new energy technologies, which would consequently help the environment and the economy by making the country less dependent on foreign oil.

Yes, Yes, that worked so well with Solyndra.

23 posted on 12/09/2011 5:51:32 AM PST by sockmonkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson