Yeah here’s my response to you, I was using hyperbole to a bunch of people stating all kinds of wild conclusions about someone they don’t know and who hasn’t even been accused of anything. Including comparing her to a woman who murdered children in the UK.
Forgive me for trying to inject a little reason and morality when people get carried away, and now we have you comparing me to some post in 2010.
I’m unimpressed.
You used hyperbole, and I’ll bet others used hyperbole, too. The dog-gone thing is that Jerry has admitted to showering with young boys, and to hugging them while naked. He says he did “some of those things”. So why is Dottie defending him? I understand wanting to defend your spouse, but surely she can say “Jerry, showering with those boys was wrong!”
It is no longer a leap of faith for one to think that Jerry did the other vile acts, too. Someone (Jerry) who doesn’t see anything wrong with showering with boys might also think it’s OK to sexually abuse them in other ways. The insanity has to stop.
I can see how a woman might miss some things happening. I can’t see how Dottie thinks that it’s okay that her husband showered with these boys. His words. He spoke them. And yet she dares to say that they’re making ALL of this up?
There is such a thing as a woman’s instinct. It’s that gut feeling that something just isn’t right, and you can’t shake it no matter how much you try to persuade yourself otherwise.
I really believe that Dottie knew something, and it was more convenient to disregard her gut. She is really in for something when she finally starts to admit that she looked the other way all this time. It will be devastating for her.