[Williams]

There is a huge difference between “suspecting something” and being a “Monster, wicked witch, vampire, etc.....” and knowing a kid is being raped in the basement.

This is why we have trials and juries and rights to a defense. This crowd would run out and murder the guy’s wife and you all know what she knew, why she did it, just like the couple that buried kids in the UK, on and on.

Isn’t it too damn easy to join this lynch mob? How about waiting till someone knows what actually happened?

Just a wild guess that as new stories come out, some may not be accurate.

And no I’m not a MONSTER, vampire, and I have no use for child molesters. I might consider torturing some of them to death, but that’s another story.

[hosepipe]

[ Isn’t it too damn easy to join this lynch mob? How about waiting till someone knows what actually happened? ]

Maybe he just offered them some Jesus juice!!..
like the guy that wore his under pants on the outside..
What was his name?..

[Colofornian]

This crowd would run out and murder the guy’s wife and you all know what she knew, why she did it, just like the couple that buried kids in the UK, on and on. Isn’t it too damn easy to join this lynch mob?

You know, it wasn't all that long ago (I think Summer of 2010) when a FREEPER poster mentioned that some of the other posters would have enough mayhem in them to be linked to a murder that just occurred in Visalia, CA.

That FREEPER poster was zotted for saying what he did.

Here, you've just said "This crowd would run out and murder the guy’s wife..."

I frankly don't see too much of a distinction between what got that 2010 FREEPER zotted and what you just said -- other than the Visalia murder was actual and your comment is a "mere" potential.

Either way, you and that zotted one are accusing other FREEPERS of murderous intent.

I'm not the "zot" decision-maker around here, but in case the AM might be interested, wanna explain to him/her why your accusation doesn't constitute a potentially "zottable" offense?

[livius]

I wasn’t “joining a lynch mob,” and in fact I said that if she did suspect this, it’s possible that she was acting the way any psychologically abused woman would act - that is, very submissive, willing to excuse or ignore anything, etc.

Many, many women married to child molesters or even killers of children have simply mentally denied the whole thing and seem to be totally surprised when he is arrested. Others have participated, but this does not seem to be the case with Sandusky’s wife.

How is this advocating lynching her?

[ArrogantBustard]

I might consider torturing some of them to death, but I definitely want them to be properly tried and convicted in open court first.

Lynching the innocent is even more vile than rape.