But for those who can see Romneys statism as plain as day, it should be just as easy for them to see it in Gingrich too.
Glad you pinged Jim Robinson. He posted this;
Wed Dec 07 2011 04:11:16 GMT-0800 (Pacific Standard Time) · 54 of 84
Jim Robinson to *****
“It doesnt do our side any good to run down our leading candidate and falsely portray him to be the same as RINO Romney. Theyre polar opposites. Within a few weeks, Perry, Bachmann, Santorum and Huntsman are all going to have to realize they didnt make the cut. Theyre going to have to release their loyal supporters and hopefully theyll encourage them to coalesce behind the more conservative of the leading candidates and the one most likely to take the battle hard against Obama. And that would be Newt Gingrich. RINO Romney must be blocked and Obama defeated. Our future as a free country depends upon it.”
I couldn’t agree more. The relentless tearing down of someone who has a shot at kicking Obama down the stairs needs to be supported, not sniped at.
It’s common sense.
Newt's record in congress is actually quite conservative. We can use his deficit reducing, tax cutting, budget balancing talents right now. And he's an aggressive fighter. We're going to need that.
Romney saddled Massachusetts with budget busting RomneyCare, taxpayer funded "safe and legal" abortion, gay marriage, leftist judges and a completely destroyed Republican label. And RomneyCare did become the model and impetus for ObamaCare.
Not to mention the fact that Newt has the support of the Republican conservative base and the grassroots tea party supporters:
Romney has the support of the establishment elite and shares the moderate/liberal RINO vote:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/151355/Gingrich-Romney-Among-GOP-Voters-Nationwide.aspx
Who you gonna call?