Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This Will Be The World's Richest Country In 2050
TBI ^ | 12-7-2011 | Joe Weisenthal

Posted on 12/07/2011 7:43:04 AM PST by blam

CHART OF THE DAY: This Will Be The World's Richest Country In 2050

Joe Weisenthal
Dec. 7, 2011, 9:40 AM

Goldman has a new report out on The BRICs countries after 10 years, and how global markets will continue to evolve.

Remember, the BRICs are Brazil, Russia, India, and China -- the four countries identified 10 years ago by Goldman's Jim O'Neill as being the global growth-drivers of the next generation.

This new report discusses various themes, including the emergence of non-BRIC emerging markets, as well as a general flattening of income equality over the next several years.

Goldman also makes its prediction for what the richest economies will be in the year 2050.

The good news for the U.S.: The U.S. will remain top dog on a per-capita-GDP basis (this list does exclude some tiny countries, like the Mideast petro-kingdoms, which might actually be higher).

According to the report, China will be far and away the world's biggest economy, but on a per-capita-GDP basis, it still won't even be as rich as Mexico.


(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: brics; globalmarkets; rich; wealth

1 posted on 12/07/2011 7:43:10 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

It’s all about growth though. When you’re growing things are good as life is getting better. When you are in managed decline it’s misery and despair 24x7.


2 posted on 12/07/2011 7:45:26 AM PST by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Assuming no wars.


3 posted on 12/07/2011 7:50:54 AM PST by Citizen Tom Paine (An old sailor sends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

Yes, and our growth is dependent on our ability to provide goods and services for developing economies where there is more growth potential. We grow when they grow, which is why our foreign policy is linked intrinsically to our economic prosperity.


4 posted on 12/07/2011 7:53:32 AM PST by cizinec ("Brother, your best friend ain't your Momma, it's the Field Artillery.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

China: Big demographic problems. By 2050, more than half the population will be over 60, and of those under 60, about 60% will be men.

Russia: Population continues to decline, very high death rate of men 40-60. Smartest and best-educated people leaving while they can. Neighboring peoples eying empty territory with interest.

India: More than 1 billion people, of whom about 800 million are completely uneducated and living at the subsistence level. Lot of corruption in the government.

Brazil: Might do OK.


5 posted on 12/07/2011 7:54:48 AM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

And The Administration preaches to us that wealth is a sinful condition and is well on the way to saving us from our materialistic desires..


6 posted on 12/07/2011 7:57:59 AM PST by oyez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

India has 800 billion people completely uneducated ? Really ? Ever been there you moron ? There are about 400 million in the middle class and another 200 million that do have basic education. These broad generalizations with no basis in facts make you look very uneducated yourself.


7 posted on 12/07/2011 7:58:55 AM PST by Maneesh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

Then we’d better vote right in 2012. We need someone who will bring back our manufacturing base, use our own energy resourses for our own use and to sell. Allow the minerals, now on the epa & government no, no list, used in manufacturing computer parts. Remove laws used to keep private business from forming and growing. Tax companies, per sale who’ve moved overseas to keep from paying taxes here. Taxes on goods coming in, even those “american” companies who’ve moved overseas, ie, GE, now moving to china, and putting a few thousand chinese to work, and Americans out of work.


8 posted on 12/07/2011 8:00:56 AM PST by tillacum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

USA was near a top of richest nations on per capita basis some 20 years ago.
Today is it hardly in top 10 with numerous European and Asian nations higher on list.
Norway, Luxembourg, Singapore, Liechtenstein not to mention Kuwait and most other Gulf States - all of them has much better average household income than USA.


9 posted on 12/07/2011 8:22:57 AM PST by cunning_fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Nice to see someone mention GDP PER CAPITA. Even if we accept that “real” GDP growth is positive, it is still below population growth.


10 posted on 12/07/2011 8:23:38 AM PST by Darth Reardon (No offense to drunken sailors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cizinec
"Yes, and our growth is dependent on our ability to provide goods and services for developing economies where there is more growth potential. We grow when they grow, which is why our foreign policy is linked intrinsically to our economic prosperity."

That may have been true in 1950. Today? Not so much. The lion's share of our GDP is consumed domestically. Our growth (or lack of) is almost entirely dependent on the relative financial health of the US middle class, who are responsible for most of that consumption. Same goes for quite a few of those developing economies, who rely heavily on US consumption to fuel their growth.

We've also hit a point where we're in direct competition with those developing economies for resources - namely oil. Growth in world oil supply has been virtually flat for the better part of a decade - and the share of that supply available to fuel our economy is decreasing as consumption in developing nations ticks up.
11 posted on 12/07/2011 9:19:39 AM PST by CowboyJay (Generic Republican - 2012. He's the only 'electable' candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CowboyJay

Your point on oil is correct. However, the Chinese and Russians do not have the technology to produce the heavy equipment to produce oil and gas, which is why they rely almost exclusively on US companies to make the machines required.

We buy cheap electronic junk from developing economies and sell heavy equipment. That is still true today, not just in the 1950s.


12 posted on 12/07/2011 9:31:27 AM PST by cizinec ("Brother, your best friend ain't your Momma, it's the Field Artillery.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Maneesh

According to UN statistics as of 2010, the average education per adult in India is 5.1 years, and 25% are illiterate.

I agree great progress is being made, but the bulk of the education still goes to the top 200 million. It will be a long time before the average adult is a secondary school graduate, and in the meantime the large number of uneducated people will hold India back.


13 posted on 12/07/2011 9:58:27 AM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Maneesh
I just returned from spending time in Bangalore and Hyderabad. I am so impressed with the industriousness of the poor and uneducated - they are out there hustling every day. Unfortunately there is only a small middle class and these folks are also working 7 days a week. Or so it seems.

It would be hard to determine how you get 400 million or about 45% of the country as middle-class.

I look forward to returning to this wonderful place and helping grow a new company.

14 posted on 12/07/2011 10:47:31 AM PST by corkoman (Release the Palin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam

Did you see Glenn Beck’s show last night?

I think he was talking about you. “Did you hear about the guy with all the nickels?”

;)


15 posted on 12/07/2011 10:39:36 PM PST by FrogMom (There is no such thing as an honest democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrogMom
"Did you see Glenn Beck’s show last night?

I think he was talking about you. “Did you hear about the guy with all the nickels?” "

No, I didn't see Glenn Beck. He was probably talking about Kyle Bass who has one million dollars worth of nickels. See this post:

In Debt Up To Our Eyeballs (Kyle Bass Has 20 Million Nickels)

BTW, it was FReeper Travis McGee who tipped us off to the 'nickel thing' two or three years ago.

16 posted on 12/08/2011 11:32:15 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson