Posted on 12/06/2011 5:12:39 PM PST by Southnsoul
The former NRA Chairman, Biff Naylor, who hired Herman Cain says that Sharon Bialek was terminated before Herman Cain was even hired and thus he never met her. On top of that she propositioned him (Naylor) for dinner once because she thought he was handsome, which he promptly turned down as he was happily married.
Naylor also says he knew the other two that said Cain harassed them, and that whatever they took exception to was so minor that it wasn’t even reported to the executive committee or the board.
Asked where he was three weeks ago when all this was going down, he says he was fielding calls from the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Wall Street Journal, but none of them ever reported with any substance what he told them.
When asked about Herman Cain’s character, he had nothing but great things to say about Cain.
(Excerpt) Read more at therightscoop.com ...
What is this “whew” of which you speak?
;)
;)
Yeah, that proverbially itchy one.
Do I totally agree with you...Thing is, I don’t believe Cain to be a man of “revenge”; doesn’t suit him.
Whew, at least one other human out there grasps the same thing I do. ;^)
Ooh boy, I can see millions in damages being awarded to Mr. Herman Cain when the lawsuits are decided.
She got paid by the DNC, no doubt, but she won NOTHING, and didn't get the "face time" she craves.
That's a loss for her, and a win for viewers.
Just messing with ya....it comes as a complete surprise, I know.
Bwaaahhhh!!
Well it did...
;^)
I can’t dispute anything you say...but the “hate” part. Be angry, but please don’t hate...
And yes, there IS a difference.
The Left must laugh their a$$es of at folks like some on this forum who joined Politico in their trashing of Cain. I'm fairly certain some of these same “FReepers” will also drink all of the Kool-Aid that the Leftists dish out on Newt.
Maybe we’ll see just a tad before the lies flow again.
Yes, indeed.
For some reason, some who came out with that info tried to disassociate that David Axelrod as not being the David Axelrod!
Now we know the difference, they are the one and same Assholerod!
Apparently the mods pulled this thread.
It must have been bogus.
That caused me totry to find some other news source that carried it, with no success.
The Blaze, Big Government, Drudge, Hillbuzz, NewsBusters, none of them.
Wrong.
Excuse that post.
Apparently something changed my settings and screwed me into thinking it has been pulled.
Excuse that post.
Apparently something changed my settings and screwed me into thinking it has been pulled.
How accurate is the RightScoop?
>>...This is how incompetent Democrats stay in power, with these dirty-tricks allegations that are instantly parroted by their compliant media pals...<<
While I agree with your sentiment, you are ommitting half of the equation. What about all those on the right — Freepers included — who have condemned Cain based merely upon (yet) unproven allegations? Would the Dems tactics work if there weren’t so many fair-weather conservatives who seem eager to buy into whatever B.S. the dems are spewing?
Now having said that, I wasn’t all that enthusiastic about Cain but I think he got a raw deal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.