Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Natural gas boom projected to fuel job growth
Fuel Fix ^ | December 6, 2011 | Jennifer A. Dlouhy

Posted on 12/06/2011 5:27:41 AM PST by thackney

A nationwide boom in natural gas production is set to fuel nearly 900,000 jobs and add roughly $1,000 to annual household budgets by 2015, according to a new industry study released today.

The boom in shale gas production nationwide – exemplified by modern-day drilling boom towns that have sprung up in Pennsylvania, North Texas and western states – is a bright spot in the U.S. economy, said the study’s lead author, John Larson, vice president of IHS Global Insight, an energy research firm based in suburban Denver.

“Shale is really proving to be a very big job creator. It really stands in sharp contrast to many sectors of the economy,” Larson said. “During a significant economic downturn – the most significant since World War II – that’s pretty remarkable.”

Broader look

Although previous reports have focused on the economic boosts in specific regions where natural gas production has surged, the IHS analysis commissioned by America’s Natural Gas Alliance is the broadest look at nationwide effects. The alliance is an industry group that promotes increased use of natural gas.

Roughly one-third of the natural gas produced in the U.S. is extracted from dense shale rock, such as the Marcellus formation in the Northeast and the Barnett in North Texas. But government and independent energy analysts widely expect that volume to grow as shale production costs drop below those for conventional gas wells.

IHS predicts that shale gas will make up 60 percent of domestic production by 2035, with much of it extracted using horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing techniques that involve blasting water, sand and chemicals deep underground to break up rock and release the fossil fuels trapped inside it.

According to the IHS report, capital expenditures tied to shale gas production amounted to $33 billion in 2010 and will total $1.9??trillion over the next 25 years.

The firm also concluded that shale gas production supported 600,000 jobs in 2010, including oil field workers directly employed by the industry, as well as indirect pipe fitting, steel manufacturing and other jobs.

Multipliers at issue

Some lawmakers have been critical of multipliers used to predict the add-on jobs tied to workers directly employed by the industry. Larson defended IHS’ accounting techniques as conservative.

The assumptions underpinning the study, for instance, discount potential shale discoveries that haven’t been made. IHS also assumed that there would be no new production after 2010 in New York state, where policymakers are considering a broad natural gas drilling ban.

Natural gas backers such as America’s Natural Gas Alliance have widely touted a 100-year supply of the fuel in U.S. borders.

But environmental concerns about the techniques used to extract natural gas are one possible check on growth. Conservationists warn about the high water demands of hydraulic fracturing and have raised concerns about disposal and treatment of wastewater.

There also are risks that methane could escape from wells and contaminate groundwater supplies.

Fears about those problems are feeding the possible drilling ban in New York state and have spread to regions that have long histories with the industry. For instance, Southlake, Texas, just imposed tough drilling rules that Chesapeake Energy cited in deciding to abandon production in the town.

Other findings

Among the study’s other findings:

Shale gas production contributed $76 billion to the U.S. gross domestic product in 2010, but IHS predicts that will jump to $118 billion by 2015 and $231 billion in 2035.

Tax revenue from shale gas production, which accounted for $18.6 billion to federal, state and local governments last year, is projected to hit $57 billion annually by 2035 – or $933 billion total over the next 25 years.

Benefits also include cheaper power bills for consumers. Savings from lower gas prices are projected to add an annual average of $926 per year in disposable income to U.S. households between 2012 and 2015.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; naturalgas; shale; shalegas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: StraightDave

Natural Gas has existed in most of those water wells long before they started hydraulic fracturing in the area. Some of the water wells actually drilled into shallow gas fields not related to the shale development.

Data Confirm Safety Of Well Fracturing - JULY 2010
http://www.aogr.com/index.php/magazine/frac-facts

...Since that fateful day in 1949, hydraulic fracturing has done more to increase recoverable reserves than any other technique. In the more than 60 years following those first treatments, more than 2 million frac treatments have been pumped with no documented case of any treatment polluting an aquifer.

...

Studies conducted by governmental agencies and respected authorities have unanimously concluded that hydraulic fracturing is safe. The Environmental Protection Agency, the Ground Water Protection Council and the Interstate Oil & Gas Compact Commission all have found hydraulic fracturing nonthreatening to the environment or public health.

As displayed on the Energy in Depth Web site (http://www.energyindepth.com/), the GWPC’s survey of state energy regulatory agencies found no documented cases of contaminated drinking water linked to hydraulic fracturing. The GWPC also concluded that state regulations were sufficient to ensure the integrity of the water supply. A 2002 study conducted by the IOGCC confirmed the GWPC’s conclusion that no evidence could be found of contaminated drinking water related to hydraulic fracturing.

more at link


21 posted on 12/06/2011 8:09:33 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MrB
My own view is that if you could them to admit it, most female libs, like my sisters, vote Dem to support abortion. My sisters tacitly have said as much when at different times I've asked them why they were going to vote for a certain Dem candidate. They all replied, separately from one another, that they were worried that a teenage girl wouldn't be able to get an abortion. They know diddly squat about most major issues. Or history or a lot of other things. For them, abortion "rights" trumps everything including national defense, the economy, all issues.

They do however know all the movie stars and latest movies, tv shows, fashion, etcetera. Like most people who vote for Dems, they have scant knowledge of why and how the free-market system has created the conditions which have allowed them to live such grand lives. They certainly wouldn't want to live the green/Occupandia lifestyle.

22 posted on 12/06/2011 10:15:56 AM PST by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: fabian
I agree. What would happen if the states told the EPA or NLRB to stuff it? Would Obama send in federal troops? Would the troops fire on its own citizens? It is time to resist the bureaucrats from Washington.
23 posted on 12/06/2011 11:11:01 AM PST by SailormanCGA72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: driftless2

And further, if you pressed them, they’d say that they’d accept the fact that many girls are pressured into abortions by boyfriends or child molesters

as long as it remained available “for those who need it”.


24 posted on 12/06/2011 11:13:31 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SailormanCGA72

Yes! Tell them to go to hell...we want our country back and we are willing to take it back! How dare they...


25 posted on 12/07/2011 8:17:46 AM PST by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo with laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: thackney

thackney —

Thanks for the link on rig activity. It is certainly telling.

Gwjack

P.S. My apologies for my slow response.


26 posted on 12/10/2011 5:20:19 PM PST by gwjack (May God give America His richest blessings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gwjack

More info at:

North America Rotary Rig Counts – Current Week Data
By State, type and Historical data
http://investor.shareholder.com/bhi/rig_counts/rc_index.cfm

Interactive Graphical Current Rig Data
http://gis.bakerhughesdirect.com/RigCounts/default2.aspx


27 posted on 12/11/2011 5:58:43 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson