Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Please Note: Discussion is welcomed not attacks. I am not tearing anyone down but simply pointing out that Gingrich, no matter what he ‘says’, has been no Friend to OUR rights.

These things can be proven by simply researching previous positions that are on the record. There has been no recent epiphany regarding these positions. The only epiphany is the one that his tongue has had.

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to KEEP AND BEAR ARMS, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED”

NO COMPROMISE!


1 posted on 12/05/2011 3:04:55 PM PST by Outlaw Woman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
REASON MAGAZINE/REASON.COM

Newt Gingrich Stabs Gun Owners in the Back

Katherine Mangu-Ward | December 5, 2011

In my inbox today, a message from Georgia Gun Owners who are grumpy about GOP darling of the day Newt Gingrich's record on gun control. They note his support for restrictions on the gun rights of people involved in misdemeanor domestic violence charges and the fact that he played nice with Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on gun-free school zone legislation. "But the biggest knife that Newt plunged into the back of all Americans and gun owners who wish to defend themselves and their families, was his coming out in support of a national thumbprint database for gun owners," said [D.R. Leonard, Political Director of Georgia Gun Owners]. Hey, at least his choice of weapons is ideologically consistent!

2 posted on 12/05/2011 3:08:39 PM PST by Outlaw Woman ( Hello, Hello....it's only me....I'm everything you can't control...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Outlaw Woman
“gun free school zones act,”

A claimed "commerce clause" power that even the SCOTUS couldn't find---and that's saying something.

3 posted on 12/05/2011 3:08:50 PM PST by Huck (LIBERTY is the object.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Outlaw Woman

Newt lied? NO WAY


4 posted on 12/05/2011 3:09:12 PM PST by skaterboy (Hate=Love....Love=Hate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Outlaw Woman

I wish Rudy Guiliano would get in this race. As a good conservative I could now vote for him since morals and values no longer count.


6 posted on 12/05/2011 3:11:51 PM PST by Hattie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Outlaw Woman

Newt on (fill in the blank), a mixed record.


7 posted on 12/05/2011 3:13:25 PM PST by momincombatboots (Back to West by G-d Virginia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Outlaw Woman

But Newt’s so smart, just ask him, he’ll tell ya.


12 posted on 12/05/2011 3:21:57 PM PST by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it. (plagiarized))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Outlaw Woman


13 posted on 12/05/2011 3:21:57 PM PST by Outlaw Woman ( Hello, Hello....it's only me....I'm everything you can't control...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Outlaw Woman

The REAL Newt Gingrich. Conservative as all get-out. Except when he’s not. And that’s only on minor things like gun control, healthcare reform, carbon caps, amnesty, NAFTA, et c.,. On meaningless procedural issues, he’d have our back - even if it means sacrificing every bit of political capital on lost causes. And that’s what really matters. Right?


14 posted on 12/05/2011 3:22:29 PM PST by CowboyJay (Generic Republican - 2012. He's the only 'electable' candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Outlaw Woman

If Obama is reelected in 2012, everyone in America who is not a leftist or statist will be steaming mad, watching everything he does and screaming about it for four years.

If an establishment Republican is elected, those same people will ASSUME that “things will be better” and will not so intensely follow what goes on.


15 posted on 12/05/2011 3:25:28 PM PST by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

DOOCY: (FNF/2008) "Some comments you made over the weekend I heard replayed on Rush Limbaugh yesterday. Is it true, sir, that you think that the Ronald Reagan era is over in America?

GINGRICH: That's just objectively a fact. I think if Governor (notice..it is Governor Reagan and Not President Reagan) Reagan were here today, and he were looking at where America should go, he wouldn't be saying, "Let's go back to 1980." He'd be saying, "Here are the solutions, here are the policies, here's what will carry us into the future." And I think we've watched these guys run around saying, "I'm like Reagan. I'm like Reagan." Reagan was a unique one-time personality whose great achievement in eliminating the Soviet empire was historic. Now we have a different world with a different set of problems. I don't think it can be, "Here's how you go back 28 years to reinvent Reagan." It's gotta be, "Here's how you apply conservatism to solve America's problems today."

RUSH: Wait a minute, Newt, how are you going to apply conservatism to today's problems when you just said it's dead? Reaganism is simply conservatism. That's all it is, and if the era of Reagan being over is objectively a fact, then conservatism's finished. Now, nobody's talking about going back to the 1980s and reliving the same set of policies. What we're talking about is applying principles, which is what Reagan did, to the existing problems of that era. Those policies, the premises of conservatism, work. They are timeless. It's not a scheme. It doesn't have to be bent, molded, and shaped. Tenets of conservatism survive throughout the ages, just like liberalism does. They're both philosophical ideas. For our side to run around saying, "Well, it's over," misses the whole point. Nobody's talking about bringing Reagan back the identical set of problems in 1980. We're talking about the principles of conservatism and applying them to today's problems, and not moderating them, not modifying these principles so they're a little liberal here, a little liberal here, maybe a little moderate over here.

18 posted on 12/05/2011 3:30:28 PM PST by Outlaw Woman ( Hello, Hello....it's only me....I'm everything you can't control...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Outlaw Woman

Michele Bachmann picked up a hefty endorsement from Phyllis Schlafly today and she doesn’t qualify her promise to try to eliminate the EPA with a promise to create another federal agency to replace it like Newty.


21 posted on 12/05/2011 3:38:13 PM PST by cripplecreek (Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


29 posted on 12/05/2011 4:01:15 PM PST by Outlaw Woman ( Hello, Hello....it's only me....I'm everything you can't control...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Outlaw Woman
Might be willing to overlook the first one, the 1996 "gun-free zone act," because it was included in a huge omnibus crime bill that also included: But the Lautenburg law and the other stuff weren't buried in a bill like that and his own words are "troublesome."

However, a "C" is better than an "F" like Obama has.

It would be ice if we had a candidate that was as articulate as Newt and an across the board conservative, but there are NO perfect candidates. A conservative Congress will never enact any gun restrictions, and if a "President Newt" faces sufficient pressure from voters and Congress, I believe he would sign a pro-2nd Amendment bill into law.
31 posted on 12/05/2011 4:04:37 PM PST by Sudetenland (Anybody but Obama!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Outlaw Woman
What I love most about Perry is that he does everything in his power to make sure everyone he Governs owns guns. That's one gutsy SOB!!!!!
34 posted on 12/05/2011 4:11:00 PM PST by txroadkill (FreeRepublic.com- "A Wretched Hive of Scum and Villany" - Zotted Romney Troll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Outlaw Woman

Pro Amnesty and weak on guns?

This is our new messiah?


38 posted on 12/05/2011 4:58:00 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Outlaw Woman
I agree that Mr. Newt has been no friend to 2nd Amendment patriots. For that and many other statist actions, I will not be voting for him. No way, no how. Just like I will not vote for Romney or Ron Paul. Wasn't going to vote for Cain before he left for the land of Nod, either.

Dunno who I'm going to vote for, but if events go the way I think they will, it won't matter. It's like Ann Barnhardt said: "It's like a pageant has broken out on the fantail of the Titanic amongst the oblivious at 2:00am on the 15th, with the winner to be announced upon docking at the port of New York. That's what this election cycle is like."

40 posted on 12/05/2011 5:16:18 PM PST by backwoods-engineer (Any politician who holds that the state accords rights is an oathbreaker and an "enemy... domestic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Outlaw Woman
Newt Gingrich is a supporter of a national biometric thumbprint database for gun purchasers. Here is the direct quote from Newt:

"I think we prefer to go to instant check on an immediate basis and try to accelerate implementing instant checks so that you could literally check by thumbprint... Instant check is a much better system than the Brady process." -- June 27, 1997

This weekend, your National Association for Gun Rights, working in conjunction with our Iowa state-level affiliate, Iowa Gun Owners, began using phone calls designed to alert tens of thousands of gun rights activists across Iowa about Newt Gingrich's decades-long support of gun control . . .

. . . and his refusal to return his National Association for Gun Rights Presidential Survey.

Newt Gingrich should quit stonewalling gun owners and return his National Association for Gun Rights Presidential Survey -- IMMEDIATELY!

49 posted on 12/05/2011 5:48:20 PM PST by shield (Rev 2:9 Woe unto those who say they are Judahites and are not, but are of the syna GOG ue of Satan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Outlaw Woman

Newt is bad news for gun owners. His record is as bad as Mittens if not worse.


52 posted on 12/05/2011 6:15:30 PM PST by shield (Rev 2:9 Woe unto those who say they are Judahites and are not, but are of the syna GOG ue of Satan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Outlaw Woman

Hi lady! I read through the thread you were on yesterday and saw the major zot that was done, lol. That one won’t be missed, twill be a blessing!


56 posted on 12/05/2011 6:52:29 PM PST by potlatch (*snip*~ Having the right to be angry does not give one the right to be cruel. ~*snip*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; nunya bidness; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; wku man; SLB; ...
Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!
77 posted on 12/06/2011 7:34:58 AM PST by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson