Posted on 12/05/2011 12:13:48 PM PST by maggief
See my post#60. The fact that Gingrich paid a $300,000 fine and admitted that he submitted false information to the committee is damning enough without further details.
“four of us locked in a room in an undisclosed location for a year”
It just can’t get better than this........
There were 84 ethics charges filed against Newt, 83 were found to be baseless. It was a rope-a-dope to deflect attention from the Clinton/Lewinsky debacle. If they had anything against Gingrich, it would have been released a thousand times before today. Actually, to me, Pelosi sounds like she is threatening Newt, and she should be called on the floor for this kind of behavior. Guarantee you she has nothing, but the statment alone is loaded and she knows that alone will get attention.
I would love to see her get defeated in ‘12. Prob never happen though.
Old Nance thinks she’s got Newt over a barrel. He turned the tables on her.
People who understand hardball realize that Clinton and more than a few other democrats still in play have already had that thought about their own dirty laundry, and found many and various ways to tell Pelosi to STFU for crissakes.
Buffoons take Newt lightly. Veterans of the beltway wars, not so much.
Oh that’s a scary sight! LMAO!
Will never happen. Her seat is safe for as long as she wants it, thanks to the dope smoking, leftists who make up most of the electorate.
Oh for goodness sake, Jim. All this is is a way for Gingrich to try to erase the love seat photo with Pelosi. Nothing more, nothing less.
I don’t believe for one minute that Gingrich’s philandering was limited to wife two and three. Of course, the demrats have done their opposition research and they know what they need to know. President Gingrich will act on the demrats behalf when they tell him too.
Amen to that! I doubt his philandering was limited to wife two or three. The demrats have him in their pocket.
Amen!
Well, all I can do is repeat over and over again that if this race boils down to Newt vs Mitt, I’m all in for Newt. It’s a no brainer. Newt’s actual congressional record is that of a pro-life, small government, big defense, budget balancing, Reagan conservative. Mitt campaigned and governed as an anti-Reagan, pro-abortion, homosexual rights pushing, big government socialized healthcare installing, mandate loving, liberal activist judge appointing Ted Kennedy progressive. Those are the facts and they’re in the (real) history books. Look them up. Your mileage may vary, but if it includes rooting for Romney against Newt, count me out!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7OQoBxZZPqU
Bitchslap the Bitch with a 4” x 4”. If anyone deserves a whupping, it is Nancy the ethically challenged greedy money whore.
I wouldn’t trust either of those guys with my country.
Who you gonna call?
...is this the same woman who used her position as Speaker of the House to line her pockets by slowing/speeding up legislation?
Did he really say that? Don't tease me now....
Oh Yeah!!! would you be watching the news and shouting for joy? he did explain how fast it could be done.
I’m with you, Jim. If it comes down the Newt or Mitt, it ain’t even close.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.