Sure. And the Catholic Church “annulled” his first marriage too. The one to whom he had kids born. So he could maryy some more.
What do kids have to do with anything? Does the birth of children automatically and retroactively make all marriages legitimate or sacramental? Such a claim is absurd. And, if annulments are evil then what of divorce? Would you reject a man who had a divorce from his first wife and mother of his children and had then gone on to marry "some more"? If so you would have ruled out any support for Ronald Reagan as a candidate.
What do kids have to do with anything?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
IF you and the Catholic Church consider Newt never to have been married, then what does that make his kids?
Hint: It starts with a B.
And why bring Reagan into this theolical argument? RR was no Catholic.