Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sub-Driver
As I understand it, Newt Gingrich pled under the terms of an agreement. If Nancy Pelosi was part of the committee which negotiated and entered into that agreement I would be very surprised if she were not bound by restrictions on the release of statements, documents, and testimony.

If so, and Nancy breaches such an agreement or otherwise violates a rule of the house concerning the conduct of members of the ethics committee, she could be subject to censure.


135 posted on 12/05/2011 10:29:11 AM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nathanbedford

I am sure Nancy isn’t much worried about Censure. It worked so well in destroying Charlie Rangel.

No: If I were Newt I would be on TV tomorrow morning and screaming at the top of my lungs “Bring it on Nancy”.

Lets hear what you have to say and let the hair go with the hide.


165 posted on 12/05/2011 10:42:46 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford
bound by restrictions on the release of statements, documents, and testimony

In Washington?

Seriously?

Washington is the leak capitol of the world.

If they want any documents out, they will find a way. Heck, Sandy Bergler could probably be hired, if needed.
189 posted on 12/05/2011 11:03:11 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson