Hope Nancy doesn’t get her corrupt mouth caught in the wringer.
Either way, Pelosi is a Catholic disgrace.
He's got back-up. He switched to Catholicism since then. He's got repentance. All his sins have been forgiven.
When is someone going to reveal information about Pelosi? How she regularly cashes in on insider information, had her net worth rise 62% last year despite a recession, and how she constantly appears to be under the inluence of controlled substances such as cocaine. Oh but no need to reveal this info as everybody already knows it.
If only it could be proven Obama denounced his citizenship and went to college as a foreign national...OR...that he lied he was a foreign national to get financial assistance.
Since so much about him hasn’t been released, it will be hard to dig up much former dirt on him..although that pit has to be a very, deep one.
Just another ‘RAT-driven bimbo eruption.
I’ll be voting for whoever the Republican nominee is. If it’s Newt, so be it.
So now we are concerned what the Princess has to say. FNP!
From the woman who lives in San Francisco and looks the other way.
You mean that stuff that all turned out to be complete bullsh*t?
Democrat politics as usual.
What a disgusting lot.
She better watch out...he just may have some inside information of his own.
And Rep. James Clyburn (D-S.C.), who also served in Congress with Gingrich and now holds a position of power as assistant minority leader in the House, charged Gingrich on Monday with lacking the temperament to be president.
“He tends to fly off the handle. He will say almost anything in order to get a charge. I’m sure that he’s not serious when he says a lot of these things,” Clyburn said on MSNBC.
All this noise makes me wonder. The democrats often praise those they WANT to run against, and act gleeful of those they do NOT want to run against. To that end, they've had nothing but praise for Huntsman and Romney, but a lot of negativety for Cain and Palin. Makes me wonder....
I well remember when Gingrich was the target of those ethics complaints. Then House Minority leader David Bonior kept filing one charge after another in a disgusting display of partisan harassment. The first 83 of those complaints went nowhere.
The last one had to do with alleged IRS violations relating to the class he ran (which was televised as a series), on the grounds that it was a "partisan" event. (It wasn't). I recall Gingrich agreed to settle that one by paying $300k, but even the IRS decided there was no violation of the 503(c) rules, and declined to take any action against Gingrich.
I look forward to Gingrich swatting Pelosi like a fly if she dares to bring this stuff up.
And I have to add that when I hear Freepers using these "ethics violations" to argue against Gingrich, it makes me want to discount virtually anything else they have to say.
Time for everyone to stop taking directions from the DNC, to rally around our guy, and to fight back.
If she opens this can of worms, she is dumber than I thought. From what I read, the ethics charges against Newt were basically for using a tax exempt entity for political purposes. There is no way she will EVER bring this up. The entire DNC is doing the same thing ON STEROIDS! ACORN, Organizing for America, Get Out the Vote, NPR, Planned Parenthood ... I could go on and on. This is a chance they will not take...unless they are just that stupid. You freepers are very knowledgable, am I missing something?
I’m not a Newt supporter, in fact, he is the one candidate that I’ve long said I couldn’t support (due to his marriage infidelities...I think that shows his true principles and will account for the way he “plays” politics as well.) But after 4 years of Obama, I’ll be voting for anyone who’s not Obama.
That being said, the info about Barney Frank in the article...”But Democrats such as the soon-to-retire Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) have suggested Gingrich as the GOP nominee would benefit the Democratic Party.
‘He would be the best thing to happen to Democrats since Barry Goldwater,’ Frank said last week. Goldwater is credited with reviving Republican conservatism in the ’60s”...makes me think that Newt is more of a threat to the Dems than I believed he would be.
If Frank says we’d love Newt as the candidate, we should interpret that as we don’t want Newt as a candidate...at least that’s the sense I’m feeling. Same with Nancy Pelosi trying to derail him by some “new” allegation. She wants the Republicans to be afraid to nominate him, obviously.
I would never believe a word a RAT says.