Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi plans to reveal information about Gingrich 'when the time is right'
The Hill ^

Posted on 12/05/2011 9:39:52 AM PST by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 261-273 next last
To: Sub-Driver

Surely you stupid Freepers weren't so dumb as to think that I would keep ethics investigation material completely confidential as required by law ... because until the indictment (if any), followed by trial and finding of fact it is nothing more than rank here-say ... ... and such untrue malicious gossip can and often does cause permanent damage to an individual's reputation.

I'll get away with it too, my pretties, because we Libtards are always completely above the law.

101 posted on 12/05/2011 10:12:50 AM PST by Zakeet (If Obama had half a brain, his butt would be lopsided)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Newt,
Someone should have warned you not to play with snakes ...they will bite you every time.

102 posted on 12/05/2011 10:13:00 AM PST by Baynative (The penalty for not participating in politics is you will be governed by your inferiors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

“One of these days we’ll have a conversation about Newt Gingrich,” Pelosi told Talking Points Memo. “When the time is right. … I know a lot about him. I served on the investigative committee that investigated him, four of us locked in a room in an undisclosed location for a year. A thousand pages of his stuff.”


When is she going to reveal the results of their investigation of Obama...where are those thousand pages of obama’s stuff.


103 posted on 12/05/2011 10:13:16 AM PST by DefeatCorruption
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dawn53
If Frank says we’d love Newt as the candidate, we should interpret that as we don’t want Newt as a candidate...at least that’s the sense I’m feeling. Same with Nancy Pelosi trying to derail him by some “new” allegation. She wants the Republicans to be afraid to nominate him, obviously.

I was starting to think that they (Democrats and news media) DID want Newt to be the nominee because they have been largely silent about his past (ethics investigation, marriages, that stupid Tiffany's thing) - keeping that in their pocket until he becomes the nominee.

With this Pelosi/Frank thing, I guess you could look at it from your point of view - if those two are talking about this now, they DON'T want him as the nominee.

Of course, there's always the possibility that Pelosi just went off the reservation accidentally and revealed something she wasn't supposed to reveal.

My guess is that her "dirt" will just be a rehash of the ethics investigations - but my concern is that the left wing news media will treat it as all "new" or a "reveal" even though it is old. There may be one tiny piece in there that is new, but they will treat the whole thing as a "startling revelation" on orders from Democrat headquarters.

104 posted on 12/05/2011 10:13:24 AM PST by Mannaggia l'America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: airborne

I am glad someone else sees it.See my last few posts.


105 posted on 12/05/2011 10:14:03 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

They are terrified of Newt.

They would keep their mouth shut or lament that he is their worst nightmare if he was in fact a gift to them as nominee.

He will say things out loud that they do not want to be heard.

He will say them when it can’t be silenced, at debates..etc.

He will call out Obama on scandals no one has been allowed to hear about on MSM and will call attention to the media itself.

He is Churchill and they are the Nazis and it’s the 30’s all over again.


106 posted on 12/05/2011 10:15:40 AM PST by Bobalu (even Jesus knew the poor would always be with us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

“Perry,Bachmann or Santorum.What will we do after the Obama DNC Axie machine destroys them all?”

From the looks of things, a lot of people on our side are doing the job for them.


107 posted on 12/05/2011 10:15:45 AM PST by Chandalier (You say Obama, I say O-blame-o!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

A book deal.


108 posted on 12/05/2011 10:16:11 AM PST by jmstein7 (A Judge not bound by the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

So she has “dirt” on Newt, but waits until an election to reveal it “when the time is right.” What an evil bitch!


109 posted on 12/05/2011 10:17:21 AM PST by JaguarXKE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Compared to Pelosi, Newt is a saint.

Her net worth increased 65% while speaker. Enough said.


110 posted on 12/05/2011 10:17:37 AM PST by y6162
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Everything that came out of that investigation, believe me, has already been revealed. They’re hoping to give it “new life” by re-stating it. A pathetic but entirely predictable strategy, designed to create an impediment to the rise of Gingrich. But the real question is, why don’t Pelosi & Co.
just let other Republicans do their work for them?
I guess that’s what she means by “when the time is right”.
She’ll fire her imaginary big guns when Gingrich becomes THE candidate, and by that time Gingrich will have the votes of so many Independents and disenchanted Obamaites, that the “charges” won’t make the slightest ripple.


111 posted on 12/05/2011 10:17:53 AM PST by supremedoctrine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chandalier

Yep and also including paid; so called blogger trolls.


112 posted on 12/05/2011 10:18:20 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
Lately I think Beck is more pro, Bachmann and Santorum.
113 posted on 12/05/2011 10:18:20 AM PST by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

It would seem that they have already taken their shots at Perry when he was the front runner. I don’t think they have much more. Nor do I think that they have much more on Bachmann than what they already showed when she won the Iowa straw poll. Santorum’s problem is that he lost in such a key state after backing Spector. But any of the three would be a large improvement on the Zero fraud-in-chief now occupying the Oval Office knowing he he likely is not even eligible to do so.


114 posted on 12/05/2011 10:18:29 AM PST by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

115 posted on 12/05/2011 10:18:53 AM PST by SparkyBass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

This is just gonna lead to a “scorched earth” environment where both parties in Congress spend 100% of their time investigating each other’s leadership, just to have the dirt to fling at them when they someday aspire to higher office.


116 posted on 12/05/2011 10:19:41 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

"So this is one of a million reason not to nominate Newt. He has stuff out there that we don't even know about yet. We need to nominate a conservative."

Yeah, he has stuff out that that never even happened....so I think we should all ask Nancy who we should vote for...
117 posted on 12/05/2011 10:20:50 AM PST by AdamBomb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Let her say what she wants. Newt Gingrich was never found guilty of any ethics violations. Thats all that counts.


118 posted on 12/05/2011 10:21:26 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

LOL!

Look at the republicans GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooo, BROOOOOOOOOOOOOoooo....

Wonder what’s going to happen next?


119 posted on 12/05/2011 10:21:57 AM PST by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

How stupid can you be? One thing about Newt, he has learned to take care of himself. If I were Pelosi I would be afraid of the counterattack which is sure to occur.


120 posted on 12/05/2011 10:22:05 AM PST by Melchior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 261-273 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson