So, Terence is too stupid to see the lie in what Tapper sought to establish. Not surprised to see someone at CNS try this deceitful ploy anew. The issue Tapper was asking about was not WHEN AN INDIVIDUAL LIFE BEGINS, the line of questioning was about the point at which the law may be successfully applied to protect nascent life with our current state of science. Are you proud to be pushing this repeat deception, this effort to fabricate a lie?
Gotta be honest with you: I fell for the sound bite, too. Had to “see” the interview for myself from start to finish.
Obviously, it was very different than we were being led to believe.
They did exactly what you say: twist an answer about how law could be successfully applied to protect nascent life and turn it into “Newt doesn’t believe life begins at conception.”
I am going to start approaching “gotcha” moments against Newt with 100% suspicion from now on. I am embarrassed that after all this time, I still fell for the nonsense.
Exactly. Thank you.
That point needs to be from conception forward.