Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kozak

And then said homeowner would be looking at some jail time.


3 posted on 12/03/2011 2:24:53 PM PST by Soothesayer9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Soothesayer9

No more likely to be tried for 2 shots then 1.
“Your honor I feared for my life and he kept comming”.

Now if he emptied the magazine and say shot him in the back, thats another story...


4 posted on 12/03/2011 2:32:37 PM PST by Kozak ("It's not an Election it's a Restraining Order" .....PJ O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Soothesayer9

It would be a difficult argument for government to prosecute victim if police were in a physical confrontation and defeated cops. Does state have castle doctrine?


8 posted on 12/03/2011 3:19:14 PM PST by School of Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Soothesayer9

No, it is only wrong to keep shooting after you no linger feel threatened. Two quick shots or even three or four would not be considered unusual.


9 posted on 12/03/2011 4:02:49 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson