>>I’m figuratively buying the deflated Cain stock now, before it rebounds and sets new record highs.
If I was Cain’s campaign manager, I would be using this time now to formulate a point by point refutation speech delivered with a speech by the wife about the lies and they damage they cause on Monday.
The speech needs to EXPLICITLY name times, dates, and people. The speech needs to EXPLICITLY address the three women and their inability to create proof.
The speech finally needs to ADDRESS THE PERSON BEHIND THE OFFERS OF MONEY TO THESE WOMEN AND TELL THEM TO STOP.
The burden of proof needs to be firmly placed on the accusers. There also needs to be attention paid to the fact that the accusations are vacuous and sequential, as if someone is playing cards when the former ones falter.
The wife needs to speak and their should be tears. This is her man, Herman, and she needs to ultimately destroy them with the statement that “Whoever is doing this smear job SHOULD BE ASHAMED!”
Do this and kiss Newt and Mitt goodbye.
Here’s a snippet from a website that has put a few pieces together:
http://mychal-massie.com/premium/more-evidence-that-demands-an-answer/
“Now, to begin my conspiracy theory…
I still find something very very fishy that all the “accusers revolve around the NRA. This man has been in business over 40 years.
Department of the Navy? - No Accusers.
Coca-Cola? - No Accusers.
Burger King? No Accusers.
Pillsbury? - No Accusers.
Godfather’s Pizza? - No Accusers.
Kansas City Fed? - No Accusers?
Americans for Prosperity? - No Accusers.
Radio Talk Show Host? - No Accusers.
He was President of the NRA for only 3 years, 1996-1999. And so far NO allegations outside of that time?”
I agree. Good comments...