“Yea, right. Turn the money over to Obama and his thugs. Brilliant!”
First my stance on Paul: Raving lunatic.
Secondly: Paul is not only raving mad, he is very corrupt if in fact he is earmarking, then voting against.
Thirdly: Beck is also a raving lunatic, but a lunatic with very good fact checkers. I quit watching him when he started crying on Fox. Seeing a grown man cry over politics, is just disgusting. I mean, yeah, you can cry to yourself, but crying in front of me just makes you out to be a doomer. Who knows, we may be heading for DOOM and GLOOM! But I surely will participate in a attempt at recovery rather than crying on TV about it.
And in regards to your statement quoted above, how about not putting them in, in the first place? Then I might would trust him.
I am not going to call you any names or attempt to value your worth to society by your unbridled affection for Mr. Paul, but I would guess you have some motive for attempting to shoot Beck down on this, with a unsubstantiated post attacking a man (Beck) who is very important to at least a small percentage of Free Republic members.
Evidently you find Paul lacking yourself, or you just like stirring the pot. I was accused of being a liberal for giving a person to choices when I called them out on their idiotic rambling. So, have any choice you want, but my *view* is that you only have *two*.
>>>Paul is not only raving mad, he is very corrupt if in fact he is earmarking, then voting against.<<<
You have been greatly deceived. Ron Paul is one of the most sane people to ever hold political office.
Regarding voting against every budget, you are correct that he does, in every case. He will not vote for a budget until there are no unconstitutional expenditures. His earmarking is a strategy to increase transparency. Nothing more, nothing less. He would prefer the entire budget be earmarked so we can see how our money is spent. Even better, reduce the budget to include only constitutionally authorized expenditures.
>>>Beck is also a raving lunatic, but a lunatic with very good fact checkers.<<<
His fact checking was poor this time, as is the fact checking for quite a few Freepers on this matter.
>>>I would guess you have some motive for attempting to shoot Beck down on this, with a unsubstantiated post attacking a man (Beck) who is very important to at least a small percentage of Free Republic members.<<<
My motive is this: Beck smeared an honorable man with half-truths and innuendos.
>>>Evidently you find Paul lacking yourself, or you just like stirring the pot.<<<
Not really. I am only trying to set the record straight. Paul’s record on earmarking has been spun by haters and the ignorant to make his honorable intentions appear to be dishonorable.
Corrupt is going to Washington D.C. a man of modest means and becoming a multi millionaire while serving in Congress. How many times have we seen that happen? How to you think that happens? Ron Paul, (a practicing doctor) after 30 years in Congress is still a man of modest means. Corrupt is the one thing Ron Paul isn’t.