Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

THE MAIN POINT OF THE ARTICLE:

A Gingrich presidency, if such a thing can even be imagined, would be a chaotic catastrophe. A Gingrich nomination would yield an Obama landslide.

So that leaves us with the two governors, Mitt Romney and Jon Huntsman. Romney has the better record as an administrator. I still think that his Massachusetts health-care plan showed creative leadership on an important problem — even if he himself now declines to defend his own accomplishment.

Romney has spoken well and firmly about the need to stop Iran’s nuclear weapons program. He has a keen understanding of the debt and financial problems of the U.S. and Europe.


2 posted on 11/26/2011 5:42:57 PM PST by SeekAndFind (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

IBTZ!

If you support Obama, just say so plainly. No need to hide behind the Romney cousins.


4 posted on 11/26/2011 5:46:18 PM PST by iowamark (Rick Perry says I'm heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The neocons are so opportunistic, laughably so. Frum, the man who helped give us the Iraq disaster, now intends to vote for a peacenik without even the hint of irony.


6 posted on 11/26/2011 5:47:49 PM PST by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
So that leaves us with the two governors, Mitt Romney and Jon Huntsman.

What's Rick Perry? Oh right, Frum simply dismisses him as "dim." Because buying into global warming nonsense like Romney and Huntsman is smart.

10 posted on 11/26/2011 5:50:24 PM PST by xjcsa (Ridiculing the ridiculous since the day I was born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
And I should pay attn. to this loser ---why?

vaudine

11 posted on 11/26/2011 5:51:19 PM PST by vaudine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

NO ROMNEY!


16 posted on 11/26/2011 5:56:37 PM PST by TribalPrincess2U (WE ARE AMERICA! DONATE TO FR MORE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Everone’s entitled to their opinion.
But Frum would quit the party if someone other than these two??? He might as will just tattoo RINO on his head.
This is just blatant “insider” desire to control the party. There’s no patriotism here, no desire to undo damage done, and certainly no positive vision for the future.
To dismiss Cain as a clown is disingenuous to say the least. Guess I’ve seen how successful we’ve been under the
guidance of professional politicians. And I cannot begin to mount an arguement to continue down that course.


19 posted on 11/26/2011 6:03:23 PM PST by bossmechanic (If all else fails, hit it with a hammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
"As U.S. real output grew 13 percent between 2002 and 2006, Massachusetts trailed at 9 percent.
* Manufacturing employment fell 7 percent nationwide those years, but sank 14 percent under Romney, placing Massachusetts 48th among the states.
* Between fall 2003 and autumn 2006, U.S. job growth averaged 5.4 percent, nearly three times Massachusetts' anemic 1.9 percent pace.
* While 8 million Americans over age 16 found work between 2002 and 2006, the number of employed Massachusetts residents actually declined by 8,500 during those years.
"Massachusetts was the only state to have failed to post any gain in its pool of employed residents," professors Sum and McLaughlin concluded.
In an April 2003 meeting with the Massachusetts congressional delegation in Washington, Romney failed to endorse President Bush's $726 billion tax-cut proposal."

[Cato Institute annual Fiscal Policy Report Card - America's Governors, 2004.]


23 posted on 11/26/2011 6:06:11 PM PST by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Yes I'm sure David "No labels" Frum("founding member"), covert liberal Palin basher who was twice fired by conservative organizations, has the republicans' best interest at heart.
27 posted on 11/26/2011 6:15:59 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
It is also important for a candidate to be principled and have the courage of his convictions.
Of course, that requires having principles and convictions.

This is an old cartoon, so don't forget the "Pro-Communist Health Care" and "Anti-Communist Health Care" podiums:


53 posted on 11/26/2011 9:21:32 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Mitt Romney supports homo activists in their war against the Boy Scouts.

Starting during the Clinton Administration (does the name Roberta Achtenberg ring a bell?) the Boy Scouts came under relentless fire by the Democrats and their newsrooms for rejecting the idea that they, the Boy Scouts of America, should welcome homosexual scout leaders into the organization and let them take little boys off into the woods. Boy Scouts leaders didn’t think this was such a good idea. Naturally, Massachusetts Mittens sided with the homo activists.

Below are a couple of columns from 10 and 12 years ago about the Boy Scouts being turned away by Mitt Romney and the Olympics Committee for volunteer work on the Salt Lake Olympics. The Boy Scouts had been very active and high profile at the 1996 Atlanta Olympics and were looking forward to participating once again. But the Boy Scouts had just won an important Supreme Court case (in June 2000 the Supreme Court ruled that the BSA was a private organization that could choose whoever they wanted as scout leaders and could therefore reject sodomites) and the Democrats/homos were still mighty ticked off about it. Massachusetts Mittens could always be counted on to pander to homo activists, of course, so he gladly came up with a lame lie of an excuse for turning the Boy Scouts away from the Salt Lake Olympics. The Boy Scouts’ disappointment was palpable, and Mitt Romney never returned their calls.

http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2000/12/15/214301.shtml

http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/2/7/135258.shtml


54 posted on 11/26/2011 9:22:19 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Newt WOULD yield an Obama landslide. He is reviled in and out of the party.


55 posted on 11/26/2011 9:24:38 PM PST by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Romney has spoken well and firmly about the need to stop Iran’s nuclear weapons program. He has a keen understanding of the debt and financial problems of the U.S. and Europe.


57 posted on 11/26/2011 9:29:16 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Newt Gingrich: The go to guy when you're down to the bottom of the bottom of the barrel...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Romney really had a weak record as governor in MA.

Sure, if you want to start a PE company and buy out some underperforming manufacturers in the Midwest, packaged them up and resell them, then Mitt’s your man.

But he was the willing puppet of the Democrat legislature in MA, and Romneycare is the mark of a big government, small civil liberties, technocrat.


60 posted on 11/27/2011 1:37:30 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson