Replies

And Again, I did read it, and he still does not want to implement the border fence.

Fine. And I'd like to see a border fence too, but I have some bad news for you: Regardless of who wins the election, the border fence is not going to happen any time soon. St. Sarah of Wasilla could stage a convention takeover, and even she won't make a border fence happen in the next five or six years a the earliest. The way to stop illegal immigration (and this seems to be Jim's main point too) is to take away incentives. Access to entitlements and jobs seem to be the major ones. Any candidate who is telling you that he or she is going to solve immigration with a border fence in his or her presidency is either in over his head or lying to you.

Fine. And I'd like to see a border fence too, but I have some bad news for you: Regardless of who wins the election, the border fence is not going to happen any time soon.

Why?

Says who? YOu?

Do you have a crystal ball so you can see into the future?

By what set of empirical facts can you make such a statement?

This is the same canard used by Open-Border frauds and liberals, there is no foundation in truth or even possibility for that statement.

We sent men to the moon multiple times, we most CERTAINLY can complete the fence in short order.

You are giving up without even trying, which probably means to really don't want a border fence.