Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich says he is 'not for amnesty,' defends immigration stance
The Hill ^ | 11/26/11 | Meghashyam Mali

Posted on 11/26/2011 1:01:37 PM PST by presidio9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-264 next last
To: presidio9
“But I am for a path to legality for those people whose ties run so deeply in America that it would truly be a tragedy to try and rip their family apart," said the former House Speaker.

Rush nailed it (as he usally does) when he opined that once you make these illegals "legal," how long doe anyone think it will be, before the ACLU files a lawsusit (appropriately "Judge shopped") and argues it is "Unconstitutional" to make these people "legal" while refusing to grant them "Citizenship?"

Probably about as long as it takes to read this comment.

Moreover, HOW is one going to "prove" length of time in country?

These MILLIONS will be put on the "Honor System" (yeah right!!!) and almost all will swear on their Mother's grave or bible, or whatever, they have lived here 25 years and 1 month.

No "Amnesty" Newt?

Maybe not "de facto," but certainly "de jure" and if it "Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck.......ITS AMNESTY!"

21 posted on 11/26/2011 1:21:02 PM PST by Conservative Vermont Vet (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"While in Congress in the 1980s and 1990s, Gingrich tended to support illegal-alien amnesties. Later, he made fairly specific arguments against mass legalizations. But recently, his statements have lacked any clarity about what he proposes actually doing with the millions of illegal aliens. Overall, his platform on amnesties is Unhelpful."

https://www.numbersusa.com/content/action/newt-gingrich.html

22 posted on 11/26/2011 1:21:16 PM PST by BarnacleCenturion (Heartless & Inhumane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ez
Good idea. Read Newt’s 10 step immigration plan here.

Already read Newt's plan.

He needs to enforce the laws as is, build the COMPLETE fence NOW, and implement E-Verify for all employment and acquisition of social services.

No need to grant a "Limited Amnesty" (his words), no need to create a new type of legal residency, no need to create more federal bureaucracy to implement his solution, no need for physical and messy deportation, they self deport.

Problem solved and no need to compromise on conservatism to buy votes or please the GOP elite.
23 posted on 11/26/2011 1:22:12 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Now we have TWO BURRITOS. Perry and Newt. White on the outside and beans on the inside.

What the answer to all these illegals who have been here for 25 years is....”Well we let them overstay for 25 stinking years, enough is enough and its time to go back to Mejico. Plus, they can take all the money and knowledge they gained illegally. Can’t beat that.

Round up 200,000 a month. Thats just 4000 per State. LOL. Ok California and Texas would have higher quotas. Still that gets you to TEN MILLION in ONE TERM.


24 posted on 11/26/2011 1:22:35 PM PST by TomasUSMC ( FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logical me
Foolish posters think almost 20 million illegals can be deported.

Foolish Newt wants to deport them, then bring them back to get their citizenship. So he wants 20 million illegals not only moved once, but twice. Brilliant.

Of course, he probably changed his latest spin on that. Hard to keep up with his brilliance, being dumb and heartless and all
25 posted on 11/26/2011 1:23:28 PM PST by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I doubt it. I don’t believe anything he says. Did he want to pay for his own limo driver? Of course not, thats our job. Millions from Freddie Mac for an hour of “work” a month... whats the real story? He was giving them legitimacy to get the GOP to back off oversight of the “model organization”

He is totally corrupt


26 posted on 11/26/2011 1:24:09 PM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ez

People that fall for this plan are dummer than doorknobs. Look what creating a quasi-legal status in “resident” did for Texas. Taxpayers are on the hook for the differential between instate vs. out-of-state tuition rates for ingrate DREAMERS.Then as pointed out shrewdly by Rush a court case will easily create an “equal protection” lawsuit granting equal rights to “residents” as citizens. Take note of the AG lawsuit from Louisiana regarding distorted political representation by counting illegals in the census. This boys and girls is called “loss of the political nation” and will equal a taxpayer funded takeover of your nation paid for in blood. Is that really what you want?
Enforce the laws...its never been done EXCEPT by the courageous move by states like AL,AZ,GA,SC......ALL WE ARE SAYING IS GIVE ENFORCEMENT A CHANCE.......


27 posted on 11/26/2011 1:25:14 PM PST by magna carta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Newt voted for it before he voted against it. Newt is sounding a lot like John Kerry these days.


28 posted on 11/26/2011 1:26:22 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Liberalism is a social disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; Excuse_My_Bellicosity; GeronL; crz; South40; TomasUSMC; Gator113

Look: I get that you people are not satisfied with Gingrich. Some of you clearly hate the man. That is your right. But spamming threads with nothing but attacks and no solutions is not productive. This party his less than six weeks to come up with a viable alternative to Mitt Romney, or the music stops and that’s who we’re left with. The responsible thing to to would be to offer an alternative candidate and his or her serious alternative.


29 posted on 11/26/2011 1:26:28 PM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: presidio9; GeronL
Actually, this is philosphy is at the core of the Gingrich solution. Nobody who can't pay their own way, including health insurance, gets to stay.

Yes, but in Newt's plan, he FIRST wants to legalize the illegals, and then implement the cutting off of benefits.

The net result being you have now made it legal for them to keep getting those benefits.

You have just legalized the subsidization of illegals using tax-payer money(Taxes).

Get back to me when Gingrich puts things in their proper order:

1. Enforce current Illegal Immigration laws
2. Complete implementation and enforcement of E-Verify for all employment and all acquisition of Social Services.
3. Build the COMPLETE border fence.
30 posted on 11/26/2011 1:27:07 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: presidio9; Excuse_My_Bellicosity; GeronL; crz; South40; TomasUSMC; Gator113
Look: I get that you people are not satisfied with Gingrich. Some of you clearly hate the man.

The last refuge of someone losing an argument, the Hate card.

If you are going to accuse us of "Hating" Newt, at least do us the courtesy of proving your point by posting the occasions where we have shown we hate him.
31 posted on 11/26/2011 1:28:57 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

Nobody thinks that the govt. could or should go out and deport 20 million illegals. Your cheesehead argument is used by the pro-amnesty crowd everyday.

The answer is: enforce the laws, all of them, and the illegals will self-deport. It’s been VERY successful where implemented.


32 posted on 11/26/2011 1:29:17 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Liberalism is a social disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
Perry was pounded for this.

Yes, and Perry has never been for amnesty, or open borders.

33 posted on 11/26/2011 1:30:16 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
My remark was no more spam than are the repeated efforts of the pro-amnesty crowd to push Newt Gingrich and his amnesty scheme.

And I don't hate Newt. When you say something like that you sound like a liberal who says we hate Obama because we don't like his politics. We can oppose the man w/o hating him.

Free Republic is about promoting and defending conservatism, not the liberal position of amnesty. If you continue posting pro-amnesty pieces conservatives will continue rebuking them. Get used to it.

34 posted on 11/26/2011 1:32:42 PM PST by South40 (Just say NO to amnesty. Say NO to Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
The last refuge of someone losing an argument, the Hate card.

If you are going to accuse us of "Hating" Newt, at least do us the courtesy of proving your point by posting the occasions where we have shown we hate him.

Oh for Pete's sake! If you don't like the word "hate," disregard it. The clear suggestion was that a more valuable use of everyone's time would be for you to be posting alternatives instead of single minded attacks. However, if you prefer only the attacks, then, yeah, "hate" sounds about right from where I'm sitting.

35 posted on 11/26/2011 1:33:29 PM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
The last refuge of someone losing an argument, the Hate card.

Liberal tactic #3.

I don't hate Newt. I think he would make a great VP.

36 posted on 11/26/2011 1:34:08 PM PST by South40 (Just say NO to amnesty. Say NO to Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: presidio9; SoConPubbie; Excuse_My_Bellicosity; GeronL; crz; South40; TomasUSMC; Gator113
That is your right. But spamming threads with nothing but attacks and no solutions is not productive.

Now you are either suffering with a bad case of no reading compreshension, or not reading the posts you are referring to, or just plain lying, but on ALL of the threads there is always at least one reference to solutions that will actually work without conservatives compromising on their principles. On this thread alone I have posted multiple times the solution to this problem:

1. Enforce existing laws
2. Implement E-Verify for all positions of employment and for all acquisition of Social Services
3. Build the COMPLETE PHYSICAL border wall

This works, Newt's plan does not and is just another version of capitulation to Illegal Immigration.
37 posted on 11/26/2011 1:35:14 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: South40
My remark was no more spam than are the repeated efforts of the pro-amnesty crowd to push Newt Gingrich and his amnesty scheme.

Again, name your alternative, and why you like their own plan so much.

38 posted on 11/26/2011 1:35:19 PM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Here is an alternative I agree with 100%.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2812556/posts?page=24#24

39 posted on 11/26/2011 1:35:31 PM PST by South40 (Just say NO to amnesty. Say NO to Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: mylife
Yes, and Perry has never been for amnesty, or open borders.

Rick Perry's open border speech:

"Thank you Senator Lucio. President Nevarez, UT-Pan American is to be commended for its vision and leadership in hosting this unprecedented border summit in the beautiful Texas town of Edinburg.

... The NAFTA agreement not only signaled a new era of economic possibility, but a new era of bi-national cooperation. That is why it is wrong, and inherently detrimental to our relationship with Mexico for the U.S. Congress to pursue a protectionist policy that forbids Mexican trucks from U.S. roadways.

... Legislation authored by border legislators Pat Haggerty and Eddie Lucio establishes an important study that will look at the feasibility of bi-national health insurance. This study recognizes that the Mexican and U.S. sides of the border compose one region, and we must address health care problems throughout that region.

... And that vision must include the children of undocumented workers. That’s why Texas took the national lead in allowing such deserving young minds to attend a Texas college at a resident rate. Those young minds are a part of a new generation of leaders, the doors of higher education must be open to them. The message is simple: educacion es el futuro, y si se puede.

... President Fox’s vision for an open border is a vision I embrace, as long as we demonstrate the will to address the obstacles to it. "

40 posted on 11/26/2011 1:35:35 PM PST by Niteflyr ("The number one goal in life is to parent yourself" Carl Jung)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-264 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson