Posted on 11/26/2011 3:23:26 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
Edited on 11/26/2011 7:09:17 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
SOUTHFIELD, Mich.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.bostonherald.com ...
Not leery of Mitt or Newet, just not going to support nor vote for a mamby pamby RINO again.
The Republican party has foisted the likes of Bob Dole and John McLame on us in the past and I’ll be damned if once again I’ll support crap.
REAL conservative or go fish.
Mitt reminds me of that sleazy car salesman or personal injury laywer.
Mitt is the GOP John Edwards...slick smile, perfect hair, spray on tan. He is about as sincere as a “Love you” by the mother in law that hates your guts.
SPOT ON!
I guess I’ll wait on that John Edwards comparison until I see the child born out of wedlock and hear him condemn capitalism from the front porch of his mansion.
That's a nice way of saying that Romney is utterly devoid of any guiding principles, other than his own self interests.
“Romney said: “I think people understand that Im a man of steadiness and constancy.”
I just threw up in my mouth a little.
I used to think that I could vote for Romney over Obama. Lately I don’t see enough of a difference to make the effort.
LLS
In the face of America being taken over by communists in the frickin street, the only person America can produce to run against their organizer is Mitt Romney!?!? The guy who could not even come remotely close to defeating John ****ing McCain?
The GOP isn’t this stupid, they want Obama re-elected, and that is all there is to it. Romney is a punt, a purposely chosen sacrificial loser.
I’m just going to put it like this. America, in your last gasp for freedom, if all you can produce is Mitt, then I am going to LET YOU fall flat on your face, because you will have deserved exactly that.
GOP nominee Romney = Obama second term
I usually vote Republican which means I ony vote once. I will not vote for another MSM selected candidate again ever. If I cast a vote for someone because of expediency over principle, I’m not one bit better than flip flopping Romney and that is something I don’t want to have to live with.
To those who say that Romney is our only chance to keep Obama from another term I say this, you’re asking me to believe that Himmler would have been a better Chancellor of Germany than Hitler, would the difference have been that great?
I know about all of those upcoming vacancies on the Supreme Court and I ask you, can you absolutely be sure that Romney wont pick a disaster? Bush nominated Harriet Myers after all. A resolute Houe and Senate will be a much better deterrent than a RINO, lying, crap weasel in the White House.
So go ahead Karl Rove, et.al., tee up old Mitt and watch Obama knock him out of the park and you seem well positioned to blame it all on Tea Party people like me. The fix is already in folks.
House
Romney can't be trusted.
Mitt will be nominated.
And a requirement of joining that party should be that the applicant must pass (80% score or higher) a test on the US Constitution.
Then all candidates for said party should be verified as meeting the eligibility requirements for the office they’re seeking. IOW, if they’re going to run for Congress in district #2, they have to live in district #2, be 25 years of age, an American citizen, etc. Rather than go after other parties’ candidates for their failings, we’d just tell the public that we’ve checked our candidates out. No felons, no child-fondlers, no grifters, no morons, etc. A party that vets their candidates before allowing them to run on said party’s name could go a long way on a lot less money than the two major parties are doing now.
Right, I’d rather stay home than vote for Mitt or a RINO.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.