Replies

I REALLY hope somebody in the Obama Administration gets in trouble for trying to get the military officer to commit perjury in Congressional testimony on behalf of Light Squared. That action reflects a contempt for the honor of our military and the rule of law, and shows that this regime views the military as useful pawns for their money-laundering schemes.

But their attitude should come as no shock. Just like the terrorists tried their dry runs to see how America would respond, the politicians tried their dry run on the US military to see how they would respond, and to see how America would respond. We failed the test in 2 major, major failures.

The first was when the DOD quashed Anthony Schaffer and other Able Danger folks from testifying before Congress. The DOD had Able Danger’s 1999 actionable intel on the 9-11 hijackers destroyed because Able Danger had also unearthed suspicious activity which has since been confirmed as the illegal sale of forbidden encrypted satellite technology to a company that Sec Def William Perry KNEW was a front company for the Chinese military; he knew it because a colleague at Stanford had specifically matched Perry’s own company with the company owned by the Chinese military leader’s wife. Congress had been on the tail of the Clinton regime for a long time, with 2 different investigations resulting in requests for AG Janet Reno to do a criminal investigation of the Clinton selling out the White House to Chinese campaign contributors AND a criminal investigation into US military secrets being given to Chinese front companies. AG Reno simply refused to conduct a criminal investigation, the DOD destroyed the intelligence showing Sec Def Perry’s crimes, the 9-11 Commission was stacked with the very people who let 3,000 innocent Americans be killed in order to do CYA for the corrupt Clinton Administration, and Congress and the US public let them get away with it all. With Clinton still, to this day, not being seen as the criminal he and so many in his administration are.

Obama saw that. He knew the most important move he would make would be to install an AG who would totally disable the rule of law. Clinton not only installed Janet Reno who obstructed justice, but he also installed seven DC-Circuit federal judges who continuously obstructed justice on his behalf, to cover his crimes. Those judges are the same ones who are obstructing justice and covering crimes on behalf of Obama today. Obama learned that Republicans didn’t have the guts to stand up to anti-American, anti-justice puppets installed by the political left, so that is what Obama has done. What we’re suffering right now in the judicial system AND in the DOD is a direct result of our failure to bring the Clinton regime to justice. Specifically the Republicans who valued their own political games more than they valued the lives of Americans or the rule of law.

IOW, America’s enemies detected our weakness - spineless R’s who would not stand up and defend the US in the areas of law enforcement, the judiciary, and the military. Since then, it’s been a walk in the park for them.

Now that John Murtha is dead, it is past time for somebody to shine a light on how his hold on the military purse-strings impacted the NCIS’ treatment of the Haditha Marines and other accused US military personnel. Large blocks of time on the audio surveillance were removed, which is evidence tampering. Sort of like what the FBI did in Fast & Furious to cover up the truth and obstruct the investigation/justice. John Murtha wanted to get re-elected so he got the NCIS to obstruct justice for our Marines, hiding Murtha’s blatant libel of them all in a bid to get re-elected. The military went right along with it, and America’s enemies on the left saw that not only the higher-ups in the US military (like the Pentagon folks who gagged Able Danger) but also the very military justice system was willing to be bribed into mocking justice for our heroes.

True to form for at least the past 12 years, the whole military system, from low to high, refused to answer Terry Lakin’s official queries and actually ended up ruling that the lawfulness of combat orders is totally independent of whether it was authorized in compliance with either the Constitution or statutes. The military in effect said they don’t need no stinkin’ laws telling them who can and can’t order combat. (And it should come as no surprise now, then, that Obama is committing our troops to wherever he darn well pleases, without having to give any reasons, such as in Uganda...)

The story we were told about the assassination of Osama Bin Laden had holes a mile wide. We’ll probably never know exactly what happened. But the killing of a whole helicopter full of SEALS from the same unit as had carried out the mission needs to be investigated, as does the reason for the specific timing of the Bin Laden mission. We all know that mission took place just as it was becoming well-documented that the long-form Obama posted online was a very, very bad forgery. We’d had Bin Laden under control for some time, and by monitoring him I’m sure we had access to intel on AQ operations that we no longer have as a result of having taken him out.

IOW, Obama distracted from his own crime of forgery and got a ratings bump by saying he took out Osama, but the US itself is worse off than before and the whereabouts of a couple dozen SEALS who were all together in one place was made known to terrorists who killed them all in a single attack. Did Obama consider those SEALS and US security as disposable resources for his own political gain (just like the whole Fast & Furious mess is revealing)?

Even before the helicopter attack, the SEALS themselves were very angry that Obama was leaking details that would compromise both the SEALS and their missions, in order to try to convince a skeptical public that he who lies every time he opens his mouth actually did tell the truth about Bin Laden’s assassination. The SEALS felt that Obama was more interested in blabbering to get an approval bump than in actually protecting the SEALS and their missions. Like their safety and mission meant nothing to Obama compared to his using them for personal gain.

If so, he was only learning from what both Congress and the US military had already told him loud and clear: that the military is a pawn of politicians, and they would NOT stand up on behalf of the country and of justice if internal enemies had the audacity to abuse them.

Why wouldn’t anybody stand up? Because if they fought the domestic enemies as they promised in their oaths of office, they would get backlash from the communist media cabal, which can’t be counted on to do truthful investigating if their lives depended on it. And unbeknownst to them, their lives DO depend on it, because the communists who are using them now will take them out and shoot them point-blank once the communist revolution is done. They are prostitutes and before the semen of those who used them even dries, they will be left dead in a dumpster somewhere.

The trouble with the conservative talkers is that they are owned by whatever company hires them. They are propagandists just as surely as the left-wing personalities are. Their owners just give them a longer leash so they can seem more credible by thinking people. Hold your friends close, but your enemies even closer. By having the “conservatives” in their payroll, the communist-Islamist leaders can silence even their enemies.

Rush is big enough to call his own shots. But he just responds to stories that are already out there, and the media makes sure that the most critical stories never make it out there. I have had my own dealings with the head of the Poynter Institute; I have heard first-hand the excuses that are being used to ignore the real stories. And this is somebody who came to me well-recommended because of past bravery in reporting politically-incorrect stories.

We now have the internet, where the real reporting is being done. But people like me who are not journalists but are simply researching because we love this country don’t have any built-up credibility. Obama has been filling the internet with people who give disinformation, trying to stink up the internet with so much non-credible stuff that people won’t know who to trust. And they’re working on the ability to shut down whatever they don’t want to get out there also. At the same time, people like me don’t have the money to file the lawsuits necessary to get truthful information. (Not likely to happen anyway because the judiciary is corrupt, but just in case, Holder is trying to change the rules so that agencies can flat-out lie in response to FOIA requests).

Glenn Beck has the right idea with GBTV. The trouble with him, though, is that while he was still with Fox he and his family were threatened if they did not ignore the eligibility issue (initially) and probably later if he didn’t actually ridicule the “birthers”. By obeying orders rather than breaking off then and there, Beck damaged his credibility with the very people he needs, to establish the credibility of his news organization.

All in all, I think the first step we need to do is to win over anybody in the current MSM who is salvageable and destroy the credbility of everybody else so they have no audience at all, so that people will smirk when they hear even the name of Katie Couric and the others. Somebody in the news media told me about the literal prostitution that goes on with these people - sex for an interview, for instance. We need to expose that in flaming glory. Open up the curtains and reveal the incestuous relations in the DC political-media cabal so people will think “whore” when they hear the names of these media people AND these politicians. Turn the lights on the cockroaches. That may be the starting point.

We need our own paparazzi. Hannah Giles and the like, who bravely search out the political and media cockroaches and expose them for what they are. When that incest is revealed we MIGHT be able to get somebody who cuts the crap and deals with us at least semi-truthfully.