Replies

Somebody on my blog said that Eric Holder was seen by multiple people meeting with Judge Lamberth shortly before a critical decision.

I wouldn't doubt it. Judge Lamberth, a Reagan appointee, had had a good reputation for integrity and the courage in some cases to rule against Big Brother. A case in point: he ruled, at least in part, for the plaintiffs in a case challenging the legality of Hillary Clinton's Health Care Task Force.

Given Holder's reputation, one can be very cynical as to what his meeting with the judge might have been about.

This recalls the meeting of Obama - accompanied by a photo - with all but one of the Supreme Court justices about the time of Obama's inauguration.

Google is apparently blocking any search for “Lamberth” for my blog site. It comes back saying that there aren’t any results for a search of Lamberth, Lambert, Lam, Lamb, etc. But when I searched under Royce there came back several instances, and just in scrolling down the page on my blog I saw several more that weren’t listed as a result of the Google search. So Google apparently doesn’t want me to locate the information about Lamberth.

(But - gasp! - that would be a CONSPIRACY! If Google is blocking results from my blog, that would be a conspiracy, and we all know that Google is as pure as the driven snow and would NEVER engage in CONSPIRACY to protect Obama and the corruptocracy! So this can’t be true. There really must not be ANY instances of Lam, Lamb, Lambert, or Lamberth on my blog, even though I can see at least 4 of them with my own eyeballs. There. Got that argument out of the way so the Obots here don’t have to bother to give their totally predictable, totally brainless, totally evidence-defying drivel. lol)

I’ll find it. It’s just gonna take up a bunch of my time. Sigh. The only thing these people do really well is waste other people’s time. In a just world I would charge them $50/hour for every hour of my time that they have wasted. I’d never have to work again.

OK, forget Google. I found it on my own. Here was the initial comment:

“Hint: Lamberth was seen, BTW, at dinner with ERIC HOLDER, AG——
several times in DC. The “fix” was obviously in. (per DC POST data).
It is sad that a Reagan appointee would rule this way, and engage in collaboration and TREASON. May he too, meet the fate of the Rosenbergs. IMO

PS/ Lamberth made very unprofessional comments to Taitz in this
ruling. “OUT OF LUCK,”??? America is now near out of luck.
Taitz should file againt Lamberth for his vicious, sexist, and in-
temperate remarks. The DC Judiciary Board should be alerted
re this unprofessional commentary and snide attitude. Orly T.
should file a lawsuit against Lamberth for those remarks. Surely,
Ronald Reagan is rolling in his grave for appointing such Garbage
to the DC First Circuit Court. Outrage is not enough. Treason
is treason. IMO.”

And here was follow-up after I asked for more detail:

“The meetings were noted in passing only, in the STYLE section of the DC Post. As I recall, late 24-25 July (when he reprimanded Taitz), and again (2011), in early August, just passing dalliances between two demonic sweethearts. Reported on by two female reporterettes, p. 2, who run the Arts & Style section. (Gossip) They were seen together by SEVERAL witnesses. Also by the busboys, etc. No pictures were allowed...??? Why???
This was in EXPENSIVE restaurants in NW Wash, section called
GEORGETOWN. At the time, I noted it (7-8, 2011) as totally unethical.

I will try to find more. Others are welcome to do a microfiche search on the recent DC Post items. It is all so disgusting. Lamberth was obviously pressured/threatened. These people are “out of luck” traitors. They must be prosecuted and imprisoned. Judge or no Judge. This stuff is just in-your-face treason. This is NOT a lucky day for America. IMO

PS/ I did relate all on this to Orly Taitz, Esquire, LLC.

PPS/ We can just about guess what the meetings/shennanigans were all
about. Pressure, blackmail, pension promises, free meals, etc.