Posted on 11/23/2011 10:32:54 AM PST by TBBT
All he said was, “Let’s be humane in enforcing the law.” That was my reaction last night when Newt Gingrich argued that the federal government should refrain from deporting illegal immigrants who had been in the U.S. for many years if the effect would be the break up of a family.
I did not take him to be proposing a new law conferring amnesty. To do what the former Speaker proposed would require no change in U.S. law. All you’d need is the sensible application of prosecutorial discretion.
A successful immigration enforcement policy, easily implemented under current law, would secure the borders; use the capability we have to track aliens who enter on visas to ensure that they don’t overstay; and target our finite law enforcement resources at (a) illegal immigrants who violate federal or state criminal laws (i.e., other than the laws against illegal entry), and (b) employers who knowingly hire illegal aliens and therefore provide the incentive that induces them to come. (An even better policy would deny illegal immigrants various social welfare benefits, but some of that would involve changes in the law so I put it to the side for present purposes.)
Such a policy would materially reduce the number of illegal immigrants in the U.S. — if they can’t work, many will leave and many won’t come in the first place. Such a policy would also call on government lawyers to exercise discretion (as they do in all aspects of law-enforcement) to decide which cases are worth prosecuting. Obviously, if an alien has been here illegally for a number of years but has been essentially law-abiding (again, ignoring the fact that it is illegal for him to reside and work in the U.S.), and if his ...
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
Before we can figure out what to do with all the illegals here today, we MUST secure the Tex-Mex border FIRST --- CLOSE THE DOOR!
I agree. Excellent post, so well said. How refreshing! Thanks.
Yes! All persons who break the law must be prosecuted to it’s fullest extent! We have unlimited resourses of time and money to do so.
Sounds like Obama’s current policy. Let illegals stay here and collect those food stamps and other benefits, and push up the poverty statistics for democrats to use to raise our taxes. And produce more kids born for free in emergency rooms to grow up and rally against capitalism and for Obama types.
Thanks Newt, Compassionate conservatism is back.
Newt is right on.
Feel free to leave the United States anytime you wish.
I have less of a problem with WHAT Newt said than in HOW he said it. Like Perry’s “program of the week”, this came across out-of-the-blue and caught everyone by surprise.
That’s not how you build support for ideas, and it’s not how good chief executives operate. I see it as another example of Newt having to prove he’s the smartest kid in the classroom, but as one hoping to garner support for the highest office in the land, his approach was wrong.
You come here and make me....
They basically call for an easy documenting procedure that allows entire families to cross the border at will. And to let the “free market” decide how many workers they need.
They also call for a privatization of this documenting process. Just what we need when too much of our WOT army is private contractors.
Me thinks Newt is betting folks wont do their homework....
Rush just drove a stake in to this monster with, “how long before the ACLU and the democrats take it to court and get them all made US citizens”.
So, IMHO Neewt is toast, next.
I’d rather try at something that is possible - not pie in the sky. See post #6 - Rain Man explains it better than Newt.
Rush is full of sh!! today. He is so brilliant than what is his plan?
Really? How? In essence, everyone here has amnesty now. Our current laws are not being enforced so there is no deterrent.
Plans like Newts might begin the process of actually stemming the tide.
Confession: I despise Newt because he caved when the government shut down occurred effectively surrendering.
Then go get one of the other three elected nominee. I will vote for any of the GOP candidates in the general because all of them are better than 0bama.
During the years of being here ILLEGALLY there must have been times when document fraud occurred.
.. mean while there are hundreds (thousands?) of citizens in prison for document fraud. How about ignoring their crimes also? Or matching their punishment to what the ILLEGAL aliens will have to pay -- a couple hundred dollars.
And how, exactly is an illegal alien going to prove he's been here for 25 years?
Why didn't he apply for amnesty in 1986?
You're right in that workplace enforcement (and NO welfare) will drive the vast majority of them back to where they belong. The negligible amount that live here, somehow supporting themselves, not working and not taking from the U.S. tax payer, they're low priority for removal.
An excellent summation.
This is the point the pro-illegal Newt supporters don't want to address.
Entering the United States without authorization or not at an official entry point, is a crime with a penalty of six months in federal prison for the first offense and two years in prison for the felony, second offense.
Amnesty is defined as: the act of an authority (as a government) by which pardon is granted to a large group of individuals.
If the illegals do not have to answer for their crimes, they are, by definition, being granted amnesty.
Newt is in favor of amnesty, nothing less.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.