Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe
No, I'm suggesting that when you're on a presidential ticket you have to support your running-mate's platform, even if you disagree with important aspects of it.

It's why you didn't see Bob Dole decrying supply side economics after he selected Jack Kemp in 1996.

99 posted on 11/23/2011 11:50:48 AM PST by OddLane (If Lionel Hutz and Guy Smiley had a lovechild together, his name would be "Mitt Romney." -KAJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: OddLane; xzins
No, I'm suggesting that when you're on a presidential ticket you have to support your running-mate's platform, even if you disagree with important aspects of it.

So she did duty and lied to the interviewer and the American people, huh?

Show me anywhere where she has retracted anything she said during that interview and show me any quote where her current position on immigration is any different from Newt's (other than that SHE advocated a path to CITIZENSHIP, whereas Newt has indicated that these people should NEVER be given citizenship.)

Do your research and get back to me. Until then all evidence points to the fact that Sarah Palin and Newt are on the same page with this one.

The fact of the matter is that Sarah Palin is not the Xenophobe that you think she is. She is a realist and the reality is that we are not going to deport 12 million illegal aliens. She knows it. Newt knows it. Every single candidate in the field knows it.

Newt has proposed a reasonable solution.

Sarah Palin proposed the same solution.

100 posted on 11/23/2011 12:00:58 PM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson