Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newt Gingrich in New Hampshire speech: I'm best debater in GOP field
Politico ^ | November 21, 2011 | JONATHAN MARTIN

Posted on 11/21/2011 12:26:59 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

NASHUA, N.H. — Newt Gingrich has made his refusal to launch negative attacks on his GOP rivals a point of pride, but he didn't hesitate to lay out why he thinks he's a superior candidate at a speech here Monday morning.

Channeling the oft-repeated comments of what Republican primary voters say they like about him, Gingrich held up his experience and debate skills to contrast himself with the other Republican hopefuls. Continue Reading

"If you stop and ask yourself: it's October of 2012, President Obama is spending $1 billion beating up the Republican candidate [and] you get to the debates, who do you want to have debate Obama to draw clarity between the various lies they will be telling and the truth?" he asked. "I think most people end up thinking I'm probably a better debater than my friends are."

To that, Gingrich got a loud ovation from the crowd of about 100 students and businesspeople.

Gingrich, speaking at Rivier College, had been asked by a student for "the one thing" that separates him from his Republican opponents. He listed three.

"The scale of the solutions that I propose — which are much bigger and much more comprehensive than any other person running for office," he said.

And, he added, there is his experience.

"I've actually done it," Gingrich said. "I'm the only person running this year who has actually helped create a national majority twice, in 1980 and 1994" (Gingrich was reelected to the House in 1980, but it's not clear whether he was claiming a share of credit for Reagan's victory, Senate Republicans winning a majority or both).

Of his record as House speaker, Gingrich rattled off a list of accomplishments.

"I passed entitlement reform, welfare, I passed a second reform, Medicare, which was done so well nobody noticed it," he boasted. "AARP was for it, the Democrats didn't oppose it."

Gingrich also noted his pushing through a series of balanced budgets.

"Nobody else running comes anywhere close to that," he said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012debates; debate; gopprimary; newt2012; nh2012
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: USS Alaska
You are probably right, but Newt will have a good come back and will remember all three of his counterpoints.

Then why didn't he use it on Mitt?

61 posted on 11/21/2011 1:46:32 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: truthguy
Absolute rubbish. I watched that debate and to me Buckley's team won (George Will was Buckley's partner) that debate. You could have interpreted it as a Reagan win but nobody could have believed that Reagan cleaned Buckley's clock.

You must have seen a different debate. The one I saw was a special Firing Line edition, and a one on one, no George Will. Perhaps cleaning his clock was a little over the top, but that was because I was taking into consideration Buckley's ordinary prowess ... againstthe point spread, if you will. The fact that the the Buckley side prevailed under Jimmy Carter (and Ford) is a negative indicator for most Freepers. Had it not been for that one issue, Reagan might not have won North Carolina in '76, nor cleaned up in Texas, and '80 would have been a tougher climb than it was.

For the record, I am an experienced parliamentary debater and judge, and served on the Executive Committee of the Chicago Debating Society and as Secretary.

In fact, many years ago, my team beat Chris Coons' team, knocking them out of the finals.
62 posted on 11/21/2011 1:47:30 PM PST by Dr. Sivana (May Mitt Romney be the Mo Udall of 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Here is some wisdom from my college days. Never trust a good debater. They have one suspicious quality.

What makes a good debater to begin with, is that they can effectively argue both sides of an issue.


63 posted on 11/21/2011 1:52:31 PM PST by LibFreeUSA (Pick Your Poison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

You are spot on.

I trust Newt more that the rest. However, I don’t trust anybody beyond my dog.

God is going to need to bless our country again, because it seems the last blessing is starting to wear off.


64 posted on 11/21/2011 1:56:08 PM PST by Gator113 (~Just livin' life, my way~.. Newt/West 2012."got a lot swirling around in my head.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: gunner03

It is amazing isn’t it? The most ardent Newt bashers post most of their material from liberal organizations. On FR? It boggles the mind.


65 posted on 11/21/2011 2:11:24 PM PST by Confab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana
Buckley's closing remarks
66 posted on 11/21/2011 2:17:35 PM PST by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Confab

Did they lie about what Newt said?


67 posted on 11/21/2011 2:18:34 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: elpadre
Great debaters do not good presidents make -

debating skills are not the requisite talents of a good leader


No, but it sure helps when you are trying to sell yourself during a campaign.

Heck, Newt managed to bring back some of his campaign staffers that had left, including one of the top folks behind a Perry super-PAC. Pulling people over from supporting Perry to Newt's side is impressive when that person originally left your campaign because they didn't think you were a contender.
68 posted on 11/21/2011 2:34:40 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana
You must have seen a different debate. The one I saw was a special Firing Line edition, and a one on one, no George Will.

Buckley's Team


See the following:
Feauturing a Screening of Resolved: That the Senate Should Ratify the Proposed Panama Canal Treaties A “Firing Line” debate featuring Ronald Reagan, William F. Buckley Jr., George Will, Patrick Buchanan, and others
69 posted on 11/21/2011 2:35:07 PM PST by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Pride comes before the fall.


70 posted on 11/21/2011 2:40:41 PM PST by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I agree. Gingrich has won all the debates thus far save for one which Cain picked up. However this election We the People are not looking for the best debater or negotiator. We are looking for a man or woman of character who will stop the debate and refuse to negotiate where the Constitution is at stake. This is our one opportunity to refuse to vote for the lesser of two evils. We have a group of genuine conservative candidates to select from. I'm not about to settle -- most especially not during the primary for Pete's sake.


71 posted on 11/21/2011 2:53:55 PM PST by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: so_real
...We are looking for a man or woman of character who will stop the debate and refuse to negotiate where the Constitution is at stake...

What a great line!

72 posted on 11/21/2011 2:56:24 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
“but he didn't hesitate to lay out why he thinks he's a superior candidate”

A foolish nonsensical statement.

I am not a supporter of Newt, but why would he not layout why he thinks he's a superior candidate...he is after all running for president?

73 posted on 11/21/2011 2:59:47 PM PST by PoloSec ( Believe how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again for our justification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NakedRampage
To: Cincinatus' Wife

Oh, so you're a ROMNEY FAN?!?

Surely you jest! Or, you are terribly ignorant.

74 posted on 11/21/2011 3:04:04 PM PST by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Lib-Lickers 2

Speak for yourself...not all South Carolinians agree with you. You should know by now that not all good debaters are leaders. Do you consider Obama a good leader? I don’t!! You can have your “brilliant debaters”, but some of us prefer sincere, honest persons with common sense and character. Ronald Reagan wasn’t considered brilliant, but he did possess character and common sense - and he had a sense of humor which seems to be lacking in some of the candidates today. Gingrich appears to have an abundance of arrogance and a little trait of mean-spiritedness to go along with his boasts of being the best debater!


75 posted on 11/21/2011 3:08:58 PM PST by PeskyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lonestar
"Surely you jest! Or, you are terribly ignorant."

Oh, both. :)

76 posted on 11/21/2011 3:09:57 PM PST by NakedRampage (Puttin' the "stud" in Bible study)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: NakedRampage

LOL!


77 posted on 11/21/2011 4:23:26 PM PST by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: truthguy

Does everyone think Newt got to be Speaker because he was so cute? No, it’s because he exhibited leadership while the then-GOP “leaders” dithered. He used every tool at his disposal to achieve major change in Congress and in Washington.

Newt formulated and executed a plan to give us the first GOP House majority in 40 years; he made a promise to the American people, and he kept it. 9 of 10 points in the “Contract with America” were passed within the first 100 days of the GOP majority under Newt’s leadership.

He’s winning the debates because he knows, in depth, exactly what he is talking about. He’s not parroting words fed to him by advisors with expertise in a given area. He’s “been there, done that.” The debates reflect that first-hand experience.

He’s suffered the slings and arrows of our MSM. Remember “The Gingrich who Stole Christmas?” After the amazing GOP takeover he engineered, every major publication had covers and endless articles portraying him as the most evil person on earth. And they never relented. By now he has developed a pretty thick hide and won’t be taken in by the MSM.

Newt certainly has his negatives, which have been documented over and over, and I have a few ‘issues’ with and reservations about him, but it is hard at this point in time to think of anyone with better qualifications to sit in the Oval Office. He’s not pretty and presidential looking like Romney or Perry, nor is he charming like Cain, but when you get down to the nitty gritty, he really is the best qualified. He’d have legislation enacted before any of the others could find the keys to the men’s room.

I’m not a Cardinal voting for the Pope, just an American citizen voting for a president who can steer us away from the morass we’ve been driven into.


78 posted on 11/21/2011 4:49:38 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette
Committment to the conservative cause?

Ever hear of commitment to truth? That thought never crossed your mind. Anyone saying Newt is not the best debater with the most knowledge is speaking from bias since they are committed to one candidate and it ain't Newt. That's ALL I see anymore - everyone's bias for their candidate and smears against anyone else. And we speak about the liberal media and their bias!

I don't care who you agree with - what a ridiculous statement! Save for angst for Mitt.
79 posted on 11/21/2011 7:45:44 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: PeskyOne

what does this have to do with South Carolina you idiot?


80 posted on 11/21/2011 8:31:55 PM PST by Lib-Lickers 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson