Man killed by his own concealed weapon

timesdispatch.com ^ | 18 Nov 2011 | Mark Bowes

[jjm2111]

I see just the opposite and have hand a lot of experience in the military. When I carry, it’s always holstered, round in the pipe.

[CodeToad]

“That’s why, out of tens of millions of Glocks, there’s so many accidental firings... oh, wait a minute... “

There actually have been. New York City even had the trigger changed because of it. Don’t even try to claim there are no NDs with Glocks.

[CodeToad]

“The difference here is I always carry in the proper holster. Always.”

Exactly. All firearms can be a hazard if carried commando. Safeties have been known to disengage.

[CodeToad]

“Don’t need a mechanical safety IF you realize your BRAIN is your primary safety with ANY weapon.”

And if YOU had a brain you’d realize humans make mistakes, hence the term “safety”.

[CodeToad]

“I know, off topic and I don’t want to turn this into a pissing contest between the 9mm and the .45, but it is expensive to shoot and become proficient with a .45”

OK, then why make such a stupid statement if you don’t want a pissing contest?

[Georgia Girl 2]

My fiancee’ bought his XDM for the same reason.

Although the pull through on a Glock is so hard I can’t believe you could discharge it accidentally.

[Ozymandias Ghost]

No argument from me on the difference in the length of trigger pull for the Glock vs a double action revolver or most of the DAO/DA-1st-Shot semiautos that I have fired.

Note: Standard trigger pull is rated at around 5.5 lbs for the stock “out of the box” Glock. (”NY Trigger”)

As to whether the shorter length of the Glock’s trigger pull is less safe than a revolver at 10 lbs; I suppose to some extent that is a subjective judgment; depending upon how well trained the shooter is. There are also trade-offs for safety vs accuracy w/the longer/heavier trigger pull ...which, I suppose, also has safety implications if one considers the possibility of collateral damage in a high stress, self defense situation.

Personally, I think it is best to rely upon good training; i.e.: keeping the tip of one’s trigger finger rested against the frame of the Glock just above the trigger guard. If my finger goes inside the trigger guard it is because I intend to shoot something.

Here's a link to a good discussion on the Glock trigger pull issue you allude to. It has some interesting data from actual measurements:

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0BQY/is_11_50/ai_n6209982/

[Ozymandias Ghost]

“This was not a dump on Glock. I own and use one. I know about their internal mechanics. I was simply addressing the issue of ‘one in the chamber, or not.’”

Understood. No worries.

Regards,

-Geoff

[ArrogantBustard]

To carry a pistol with a CHAMBERED round in it, is the only way to be sure that it will go "BANG" when I need it to.

[The KG9 Kid]

"... With respect to safety, a Glock is functionally the same as a revolver."

Only if we're talking about a single-action revolver with the hammer cocked.

With respect to safety, a Glock is not the same as a double-action revolver that's not cocked.

[xsrdx]

Horrible, tragic story, RIP and condolences to his family.

As has been stated already, striker-fired and SA autopistols in general and Glocks in particular are not the best choice for carry in any fashion that leaves the trigger guard exposed.

An "external" safety can be easily and unintentionally deactivated IWB, and is no panacea compared to a true DAO auto or revolver.

Ultimately, if you IWB or deep conceal, consider a holster or true DAO.

[DocH]

Shooting since 8, 13 years active duty USMC with combat and competition shooting, always shot high expert.

I DO have a brain, and that is why, with ALL of the weapons handling and shooting I've dome all of these years, I have NEVER had a negligent discharge (there is no such thing as an accidental discharge).

This guy was a dumbass, plain and simple.

[Pecos]

If you have a round in the Glock chamber (which normally gets there by virtue of the slide stripping a round out of the magazine) and rounds in all chambers of a revolver, then pulling the trigger on either firearm will result in a bang. Any belief in “safe action” beyond that point requires too many fairy tale best wishes for my comfort. I have, and use, Glocks, but Mr. Glock isn’t going to be there to comfort my family if I rely too much on his marketing abilities.

Going back to the original story, my guess is that somehow the Glock trigger was pulled.

[The KG9 Kid]

"... If you have a round in the Glock chamber (which normally gets there by virtue of the slide stripping a round out of the magazine) and rounds in all chambers of a revolver, then pulling the trigger on either firearm will result in a bang."

Activating the trigger on a Glock is easier than the trigger on a double-action revolver.

Just here in the FR archive, there are numerous recorded incidents of Glock mishandling negligent discharges that would not likely happen with a double-action revolver and would never happen with an Hk P7 automatic.

A Glock is mechanically engineered to not be able to be a confidently prevented from accidental/negligent discharge as other competing designs with features such as grip safeties and DA/SA trigger operation.

Those who carry Glocks for CCW need to honestly understand they're carrying a cocked single-action pistol. The Glock was intended as a military sidearm using a military holster, not a dedicated CCW piece like a S&W Model 36 or a Colt Detective Special.

I often carry a Glock 19.