Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RitaOK
I see your overall point of losing two. But it is you that needs a clue not Cain There are a lot of places that oppose Obamacare.Big deal.Justice Thomas’ wife should not reflect Justice Thomas’ decision or recusal. Justice Kagan’s Emails show Kagan had her hand in crafting legal defense for Obamacare.

There is a big difference.It is the MSM that have thrown in that Thomas should recuse.There is a solid case of recusal for Kagan.

32 posted on 11/17/2011 1:04:37 PM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

Actually you replied to a remark that I didn’t make, but agreed with @ #28. I have no idea what the standard is for conflict of interest, but was somewhat stunned to hear myself, on GRETA, that “they” are looking at Thomas for a conflict of interest, due to the wife’s employment. Maybe Laura Ingraham will comment since she worked with Thomas at the SC.

My surprise is simply with Cain for not being informed of the Thomas issue before pointing a finger. At least he could have addressed the fact that there two opposing camps exist right now, and both are bubbling on the subject of recusals. As I said, this will die a quiet death since both sides are affected. Cain will go silent also.


38 posted on 11/17/2011 1:16:21 PM PST by RitaOK (Rasmussen is the polling standard who owns the record on accuracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson