Actually you replied to a remark that I didn’t make, but agreed with @ #28. I have no idea what the standard is for conflict of interest, but was somewhat stunned to hear myself, on GRETA, that “they” are looking at Thomas for a conflict of interest, due to the wife’s employment. Maybe Laura Ingraham will comment since she worked with Thomas at the SC.
My surprise is simply with Cain for not being informed of the Thomas issue before pointing a finger. At least he could have addressed the fact that there two opposing camps exist right now, and both are bubbling on the subject of recusals. As I said, this will die a quiet death since both sides are affected. Cain will go silent also.
You,, little RitaOK, assumed that Mr. Cain was unaware of Thomas’s possible connection with the case? I am no attorney. Are you? Or do you employ a crystal ball? In that case, you’ve fogged it up good. Justice Thomas will know decide if he should recuse himself or not. But it is common knowledge that Kagan helped author that horrible and I think unconstitutional Obamacare, thus she definitely should recuse herself. Let us hope that the rampant corruption in Washington does not extend to the Supreme Court! You assumed, and you know what they say about assume! :o0)