Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mike McQueary — poster child for moral relativism?
Bookwormroom.com ^ | Nov 17 2011 | Bookworm

Posted on 11/17/2011 12:00:46 PM PST by servo1969

I had in my car two fourteen year olds and one thirteen year old. All were familiar with the Sandusky case, so I wasn’t exposing them to sordid information they didn’t already know. None of them, however, knew about Mike McQueary’s involvement, or lack thereof. I gave them a simple multiple choice question:

You walk into a room and see a 50 year old man raping a 10 year old boy. Do you (a) attack the man and try to drag him off the boy or (b) sneak away and, hours later, ask your parents what you should do?

The roar from the back of the car shook the windows: “I’d rip him apart!” “Of course I’d attack him!” “I’d kick him the balls!” “That’s a really dumb question.”

As the response from these very young people demonstrates, McQueary’s young age (28) is no defense to his action. Young people can and do know right from wrong, and child rape is wrong.

How to explain McQueary then? I think the problem isn’t his young age, ’cause he, at 28, was no youngster. The problem was his old age. He’d been around long enough to be fully indoctrinated. All those liberal pundits who are apologizing for McQueary’s behavior by pointing to his youth, his tribal loyalties, and his lukewarm, delayed response are hiding the ball. For liberals, the uncomfortable truth is that McQueary probably didn’t act because, after a lifetime in America’s public education system, his moral relativism training had completely erased any absolute moral standards that might once have populated his pre-academic brain.

(Excerpt) Read more at bookwormroom.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: mcqueary; mike; moral; pedstate; pennstate; psu; relativism; sandusky
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: greatvikingone
I don't think he changed his story because he made anything up about Sandusky. I think he changed his story because the first way he told it (most likely the truth) made him look like a moral and mental midget, and he didn't realize until after he had told his story exactly how much of a moral and mental midget it made him appear.

Plain and simple, he's (now) trying to cover his own ass, so to speak...

21 posted on 11/17/2011 12:31:06 PM PST by WayneS (Comments now include 25 percent more sarcasm for no additional charge...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

You got that right. Be looking for that perp in the Everglades. And won’t find him.


22 posted on 11/17/2011 12:31:15 PM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

McQueary faced one of those moments that defines character, which is am I going to do the right thing or the right thing for me. He came up short.


23 posted on 11/17/2011 12:32:21 PM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
there were accusations years before the rape that McQ supposedly testified too....Sandusky resigned afterwards...

the coverup started then....and according to reports, the ONLY reason McQ came forward was because there were postings somewhere on a blog and the cops tracked down McQ...

24 posted on 11/17/2011 12:32:38 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Definitely possible.


25 posted on 11/17/2011 12:32:45 PM PST by greatvikingone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Umm... happens all the time at the local YMCA.


26 posted on 11/17/2011 12:33:07 PM PST by Locomotive Breath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: WayneS
Plain and simple, he's (now) trying to cover his own ass, so to speak...

And it's hurting the prosecution's case. If he's the main witness, he's not helping his credibility.

27 posted on 11/17/2011 12:33:57 PM PST by dfwgator (I stand with Herman Cain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: greatvikingone

Nice.

At least now I am no longer surprised at your defense of a child-rapist and his enablers.


28 posted on 11/17/2011 12:34:17 PM PST by WayneS (Comments now include 25 percent more sarcasm for no additional charge...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
"what a lot of us were doing in the military before we were 28."

yeah...my dad was in the Navy at age 17 in WW2....back then we had boys that were MEN...

29 posted on 11/17/2011 12:34:42 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Agreed.


30 posted on 11/17/2011 12:34:45 PM PST by WayneS (Comments now include 25 percent more sarcasm for no additional charge...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Not defending anyone.


31 posted on 11/17/2011 12:35:46 PM PST by greatvikingone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

He also went to the supervisor of the campus police.

But, yes, if that was the reason for Paterno and Sandusky’s icy relationship, that does not reflect well on Paterno.


32 posted on 11/17/2011 12:35:53 PM PST by WPaCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

I wouldn’t expect him to run out under fire and grab a wounded comrade, that’s for sure.

Or dive into the river for the drowning kid.


33 posted on 11/17/2011 12:36:05 PM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: greatvikingone; WayneS
I am sorry about this post!!

I completely mis-read which of mine you were responding to.

34 posted on 11/17/2011 12:37:28 PM PST by WayneS (Comments now include 25 percent more sarcasm for no additional charge...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: greatvikingone

Please see Post #34.

You have my sincere apologies.


35 posted on 11/17/2011 12:38:29 PM PST by WayneS (Comments now include 25 percent more sarcasm for no additional charge...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

I don’t think McQ saw anything close to rape, just a man and and a boy showering together. That is bad enough — no need for Bookworm to exaggerate what was seen.


36 posted on 11/17/2011 12:39:53 PM PST by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

“I am sorry about this post!!
I completely mis-read which of mine you were responding to.”

No worries, Mate. I didn’t help by not quoting.

My concern here is that McQueary could be hurting the case - - and I cannot find a positive thing to say about him whether he is lying or evolving his truth.


37 posted on 11/17/2011 12:40:42 PM PST by greatvikingone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

What makes this so puzzling is that he once broke up a knife fight between football players and his dad was also a special ops guy.


38 posted on 11/17/2011 12:41:39 PM PST by WPaCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
McQueary did not change his testimony.

WE do not know what his testimony was before the Grand Jury. The only thing that has been published is the grand jury SUMMARY. The fact that he was placed on leave and not fired outright is important. What he saw, and is willing to testify to is critical to the case. Until others start to come forward, which is what is happening now, he was/is their most important witness.

39 posted on 11/17/2011 12:43:22 PM PST by codder too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WPaCon

Maybe swords intimidate him, but knives do not?

...

...

...

...I’m sorry, that was tasteless and immature...


40 posted on 11/17/2011 12:43:51 PM PST by WayneS (Comments now include 25 percent more sarcasm for no additional charge...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson