WOW! You are SO wrong.
Wong Kim Ark has zip-zero-nada to do with natural born citizen.
Multiple Instances Of Historical Scholarship Conclusively Establish The Supreme Court’s Holding In Minor v. Happersett As Standing Precedent On Citizenship – Obama Not Eligible.
JUSTIA.COM SURGICALLY REMOVED “MINOR v HAPPERSETT” FROM 25 SUPREME COURT OPINIONS IN RUN UP TO ’08 ELECTION.
Posted in Uncategorized on October 20, 2011 by naturalborncitizen
[UPDATE #3 8:54 AM Oct. 24, 200 - Justia.com has suddenly placed robots over their entire cite. So much for Justia’s mission, “To advance the availability of legal resources for the benefit of society.” Here is a link to the Wayback Machine’s URL search of Roe v Wade, a case which has nothing to do with POTUS eligibility. Here is a link to the Wayback Machine’s URL search for Minor v. Happersett. Both searches return the following statment at the Wayback Machine: “We were unable to get the robots.txt document to display this page.” This activity operates as an admission by Justia. A criminal investigation is required.]
I stated that Ark ONLY declared him to be a citizen under the 14th Amendment - BUT that the dicta contained within it noted [NOT STATED] that English Common Law ALWAYS considered children born in England to aliens were natural-born. If you want me to quote the dicta, I can - but trust me, the reference is there.
Dicta DOESN'T mean squat in a legal ruling [although supporters of Obama would like to think so in Ark].
My point was that supporters of Obama INCORRECTLY state that NBC is settled law [from the Ark ruling] ...
I was just pointing that misconception out ...
BTW: I KNOW about the Justia thing ...